Is this no longer a chanceless innings as per the first chance theory?Collingwood now equalling his best score against a ODI-class side batting four. And Pietersen almost caught-and-bowled just after getting his half-century.
Nah even Yuvraj isn't going to catch that very often. Those are the sorts of things that occasionally stick and mostly don't, especially with the non-striker in the way.Is this no longer a chanceless innings as per the first chance theory?
Nah even Yuvraj isn't going to catch that very often. Those are the sorts of things that occasionally stick and mostly don't, especially with the non-striker in the way.
A chance is only something that should be caught.
One of the least sense-making Rolleyeses I've ever seen.
Nah, your definition of convenience first chance averages.One of the least sense-making Rolleyeses I've ever seen.
Nonsense. A chance is a chance regardless, there's no conveniece involved. If you judge the overall rather than what appears to be the case on one isolated instance you'll see this.Nah, your definition of convenience first chance averages.
Finally some moveon.Nah, your definition of convenience first chance averages.
This partnership is giving undue credit to Yuvraj.
If that catch didnt qualify for first chance, then doesnt any of Sehwag's triple 100.Nonsense. A chance is a chance regardless, there's no conveniece involved. If you judge the overall rather than what appears to be the case on one isolated instance you'll see this.
At least one of the three(?) chances in that innings was a rank sitter.If that catch didnt qualify for first chance, then doesnt any of Sehwag's triple 100.
Yeah if England batsmen don't not try to score quickly enough they try to score too quickly. "Just the right pace" rarely comes into the equation.And another totally unnecesary shot given the circumstance. Really shows why we've only had 1 century in ODIs in over a year and a half.