***Official*** England in India

[SJS]

Take their side, perhaps to please them.

And why, pray, would you think I would like to do that ?

 

[What-A-Player]

Can I have your autograph?

..ah yes, the sarcatic response; trying to announce your presence.

Why dont u try a real comment, unlike Naseer Hussein

 

[andyc]

No one seems to be man enough to even consider a situation, I offer videos (they reply as if England got attacked by france I offer facts ( 4 people reply to tackle me ) so in the end, facts get burried, a mod with 1000 x 1000 pixel avatar gets his points across with some " Loose change posters", bias wins, everybody wins..queen is still there and life goes on..

Videos are banned here because they often infinge copyright, and James (the owner) doesn't want to end up losing his site due to any such infringement. Neil's avatar is strangely larger than everyone else's because he joined up in 2002, when people had avatars that big. Later, avatars were made smaller, but the larger avatars remained; those members had to change them in order for the restrictions to take place. Neil hasn't changed his avatar (God knows why...) and so it is larger. All the same, I don't see why it's that big of a deal.

 

[What-A-Player]

..sorry but I didn't know you were suffering from ' Lickophobia "

 

[Barney Rubble]

..ah yes, the sarcatic response; trying to announce your presence.

Why dont u try a real comment, unlike Naseer Hussein

..sorry but I didn't know you were suffering from ' Lickophobia "

Why don't you try making some sodding sense!!

 

[adharcric]

Take their side, perhaps to please them.

It's been going on, I have seen your comments too Sir and it seems you are too diplomatic to fit in the crew than make your own opinion and anyone who dares to is labeled "hey check your spelling, woahh another racist, troll, one of those fans

So one can't (or try to) make a point becausee of biased english mods (who obviously) will take care of their kind and the soldiers follow with their short (they seem to think so) comments.

No one seems to be man enough to even consider a situation, I offer videos (they reply as if England got attacked by france I offer facts ( 4 people reply to tackle me ) so in the end, facts get burried, a mod with 1000 x 1000 pixel avatar gets his points across with some " Loose change posters", bias wins, everybody wins..queen is still there and life goes on..

Right .. so I'm another Indian. I'm far from biased in whatever way you might suppose. What exactly is your point? Better yet, do you have one?

 

[James]

Take their side, perhaps to please them.

It's been going on, I have seen your comments too Sir and it seems you are too diplomatic to fit in the crew than make your own opinion and anyone who dares to is labeled "hey check your spelling, woahh another racist, troll, one of those fans

So one can't (or try to) make a point becausee of biased english mods (who obviously) will take care of their kind and the soldiers follow with their short (they seem to think so) comments.

No one seems to be man enough to even consider a situation, I offer videos (they reply as if England got attacked by france I offer facts ( 4 people reply to tackle me ) so in the end, facts get burried, a mod with 1000 x 1000 pixel avatar gets his points across with some " Loose change posters", bias wins, everybody wins..queen is still there and life goes on..

What are you referring to exactly in your comments? What point are you wanting/trying to get across because I'm not exactly sure what it is to be perfectly honest?

We have many Asian members on these forums, and everyone is treated in exactly the same way. Colour of skin and things like that don't come into it what so ever. I can absolutely guarantee that. If they did somehow I doubt members like SJS and adharcric for example would post here.

If you have a problem with a moderator, raise it through me, details in my signature.

 

[PY]

..ah yes, the sarcatic response; trying to announce your presence.

Why dont u try a real comment, unlike Naseer Hussein

EDIT: See James' post above.

 

[What-A-Player]

And why, pray, would you think I would like to do that ?

I don't think so Mr. Saranjeet, you do so and certainly disappoint millions

I am sorry, but you do

 

[What-A-Player]

Super, now the BIG BOSS edits it, great job

 

[What-A-Player]

ahh damnn,, what a ***** cat forum...bahh!, yeah Mr. Mod I will get back to ya

Neil..shame on u

 

[adharcric]

Super, now the BIG BOSS edits it, great job

i'd like to discuss cricket here. got anything to contribute?

 

[SJS]

Videos are banned here because they often infinge copyright, and James (the owner) doesn't want to end up losing his site due to any such infringement. Neil's avatar is strangely larger than everyone else's because he joined up in 2002, when people had avatars that big. Later, avatars were made smaller, but the larger avatars remained; those members had to change them in order for the restrictions to take place. Neil hasn't changed his avatar (God knows why...) and so it is larger. All the same, I don't see why it's that big of a deal.

That explains fairly comprehensively two things that seemed to upset you and as you may have noticed there was nothing sinister behind both.

If you think calmly you may find that there are similar explanations for most things.If you want someone or the other here will explain them to you but if you insist on prejudging everything and feeling bitter about it no one can do anything about it which would be sad because from what little I have seen you do not seem to be a troll and believe me that inspite of all that could be improved here (and everywhere else in the world I dare say) CW is one of the best cricket discussion sites on the net.

 

[adharcric]

SJS, did you quote the wrong post?

 

[Barney Rubble]

I think this thread would benefit from a cricket-related post. Monty Panesar seems to be bowling well - beat Dravid's bat a minute ago. Makes me excited as an England fan.

 

[James]

As adharcric said, let's try and get back to the cricket now

 

[PY]

Any-who, back to the cricket everyone who wants to.

What do you reckon India's tactics will be for the rest of this match? Get a good base then use Pathan and Dhoni to try and blast England's score out of the water?

Or just accept the draw and move on with positives to Mumbai?

 

[What-A-Player]

Papaji. no more here..but u seriously disappoint...I have never been to Bombay but wil never wish to meet you

worst sikh ever

 

[SJS]

..ah yes, the sarcatic response; trying to announce your presence.

Do you know who or what post is likely to get the most sarcastic response ? The one which is so devoid of objectivity or so ludicously exaggerated that sarcastic response comes so easily on reading it.

A serious debating issue rarely(I didnt say never) gets a sarcastic response.

 

[adharcric]

Any-who, back to the cricket everyone who wants to.

What do you reckon India's tactics will be for the rest of this match? Get a good base then use Pathan and Dhoni to try and blast England's score out of the water?

Or just accept the draw and move on with positives to Mumbai?

They'll definitely go for a solid base from the top-order first. Dhoni and Pathan won't go mad like they did at Nagpur, but their natural style gets runs at a good rate anyways. After that, India can take a lot of confidence from the way Munaf and Kumble bowled. If we take our catches, I think we can keep England to 200, especially if Strauss chases another wide one. Then we can go for the win on Day 5.

Of course, the more likely scenario is a draw.