Oh sure but I mean the amount of research and the complexity of systems and the amount of cameras you'd have to dedicate to that alone would be... well, a lot.Every ball bowled by a spinner has some overspin which would make it dip a fraction more (even on the path after the bounce on the way down) than any ball bowled by a pacer right?.
No denying that. Get those fake "revs on ball" stats they show sometimes to make up some overspin numbers and include it in the drs model imo.Oh sure but I mean the amount of research and the complexity of systems and the amount of cameras you'd have to dedicate to that alone would be... well, a lot.
Unless you bowl him a full toss.Completely different game when Gill is on strike
It wouldn't just be that though, it'd be the orientation of the seam and arguably even the age of the ball/brand of the ball that makes a difference.No denying that. Get those fake "revs on ball" stats they show sometimes to make up some overspin numbers and include it in the drs model imo.
Nah, if it means spinners miss out on wickets then goodWonder if there's a way to have a spinners Hawkeye model and pacers Hawkeye.
I was joking and hope you are tooIt wouldn't just be that though, it'd be the orientation of the seam and arguably even the age of the ball/brand of the ball that makes a difference.
Don't think it was under par, per se. Just the difference in having good quality spinners and us not being good enough to play high quality spin.Got a feeling that day will sum up the tour. Indian spinners managing to take wickets for an under par score, English spinners getting taken to the cleaners.
If he can't kick start a career against this attack he is never going to make it.Hopefully the myth Gill misses out again
We don't really know if they even tried.Still can't get over the fact that they couldn't persuade Dawson to play. As Leach has shown, if you're accurate, you will contain or trouble the batters.
I don't even think they asked him did they? I mean he pretty much said he said no.Still can't get over the fact that they couldn't persuade Dawson to play. As Leach has shown, if you're accurate, you will contain or trouble the batters.
yea dawson would've made a world of difference. i wonder if eng will persist with 2 seamers from now on for the rest of the seriesStill can't get over the fact that they couldn't persuade Dawson to play. As Leach has shown, if you're accurate, you will contain or trouble the batters.
Spellchecker added an s before crapping'India in front but England scrapping' seems a generous assessment on Cricinfo.