Shami has been really unlucky too, he comes back and bowls world class as opposed to leaking runs to tail partnerships like Sinus.Unlucky not in the Ishant sense where he would just miss the edge, unlucky in the catches dropped sense which is imo actually unlucky.
In a heartbeat. Ishant is genuinely test class now and was the best Indian pacer till last year before Shami mkII. I say this as a guy who has fought several traumatic shadow wars against the man here over the last 6 years.Hard to argue with those numbers. Should Ishant replace Umesh if he gets fit?
At least in your case it looks like you did it because you didn't read the whole thread. With HB, not so much.Oh no I've honestbharani'd. Oops.
So. Much. Overthinking.
They wanted bits and pieces to replace bits and pieces, he needs little coaching and is familiar with the set-up. Plus be isn't an arsehole. I don't think any of that is supposed to infer anything about Leach/Rayner/Your Preferred Spin Option as a human being. Hell, I've never heard a bad word spoken about Leach (unless "he's not ready" counts as character assassination), and I'm not certain, but I think Dobell is a fan.
At least in your case it looks like you did it because you didn't read the whole thread. With HB, not so much.
Does anyone here even still read Dobell other than for hatereading purposes?Geez, doesn't Dobell like having his cake and eating it.
Yes, fair points mate, and I will stress again that the Dawson selection is not the way I would go I am just trying to make sense of it from a selectors perspective and why he has been included. The bottom line is that presumably in the selectors eyes, and I would agree with this, we have no spinner in the country who can go and play against India and be a constant wicket-taking threat. In the case of Leach, and to be fair I haven't seen anywhere near enough of him to judge accurately, if they think he has some real potential but is nowhere near ready, then it's the right move not to select him at this stage. Throwing him in against India could have a real impact on his confidence and self-belief, why do that to him ?I just don't understand how this makes sense. Almost every possible combination that we might go with for the next test has 5 other bowling options (outside of Dawson). Which means that we, more than any other team, have the luxury to afford a Kerrigan-like performance!
What we desperately need though, is a bowler who can take wickets. The way I see it, right now, our pace bowlers and Moeen have been completely neutralized. Do I think Leach is the man who can turn a game in India? Maybe not, but I think he is far more likely to than Dawson on a turning pitch given that he did this game in and game out for his county last season.