***Official*** England in India 2016/17

[indiaholic]

Aye don't compare Blocky to Gnske. Entirely different genres.

 

[Shri]

I'm sorry, I didn't realise India was such a force away from sub continent conditions - I didn't realise Ashwin had bowled them to exactly 0 series wins outside of India against meaningful opponents.

Sri Lanka. kthxbai

 

[Blocky]

Sri Lanka. kthxbai

"Sub continent conditions"
kthxbai

 

[OverratedSanity]

"Sub continent conditions"
kthxbai

You said zero series wins outside India. Last I checked we hadn't invaded and occupied Sri Lanka.

If you want to troll, at least do it properly.

 

[indiaholic]

Maybe he is actually Indian as Rootfan says and considers Lanka to be a part of Akhand Bharat because Ram conquered it.

 

[Shri]

"Sub continent conditions"
kthxbai

You said outside India. Not sure if this confirms you for what you are known for around here.

 

[Blocky]

You said zero series wins outside India. Last I checked we hadn't invaded and occupied Sri Lanka.

If you want to troll, at least do it properly.

I said zero meaningful wins.

 

[indiaholic]

What in life can said to be truly meaningful?

 

[OverratedSanity]

I said zero meaningful wins.

You're right. Winning our first series in Sri Lanka in two decades wasn't meaningful I guess.

 

[Blocky]

Beating a team where you're not reliant on crumbling wickets that do the job for you? That's pretty meaningful.

 

[Blocky]

You're right. Winning our first series in Sri Lanka in two decades wasn't meaningful I guess.

Gee, it's almost like Sri Lanka no longer had Sangakkara, Jayawardene, Vaas, Muralitharan, Dilshan, etcetera, and you caught them at one of their weakest points...

 

[Shri]

Beating a team where you're not reliant on crumbling wickets that do the job for you? That's pretty meaningful.

No.

 

[indiaholic]

Beating a team where you're not reliant on crumbling wickets that do the job for you? That's pretty meaningful.

Is it though? Is it truly meaningful?

 

[OverratedSanity]

Beating a team where you're not reliant on crumbling wickets that do the job for you? That's pretty meaningful.

Lol crumbling wickets. The decider was played on about as non-sc conditions as possible. It was a genuine greentop and provided assistance mainly to the seamers all match. Ashwin still bowled a crucial spell to win it on the final day.

 

[Blocky]

Is it though? Is it truly meaningful?

3000+ posts on an internet forum regarding the subject Cricket, and you're arguing meaningful in relationship to it. You're trolling yourself and how you spend your own time.

 

[cnerd123]

Blocky's trolling technique is terrible imo. He only gets replies through spamming threads with active bored members who want easy likes. He': never succeeded in scoring replies in tough conditions against quality posters. He's just a ftb hack.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Gee, it's almost like Sri Lanka no longer had Sangakkara, Jayawardene, Vaas, Muralitharan, Dilshan, etcetera, and you caught them at one of their weakest points...

You got me, man. I apologize.

 

[indiaholic]

3000+ posts on an internet forum regarding the subject Cricket, and you're arguing meaningful in relationship to it. You're trolling yourself and how you spend your own time.

Am I though?

 

[OverratedSanity]

I'm sure this thread being terrible will be blamed on us being bullies as usual. Poor form, guys.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Also, should I point out that Blocky was wrong again and that Sri Lanka actually did have Sanga and Ashwin made him his bunny? No? OK.