Nate
You'll Never Walk Alone
Yeah, because Warner was fantastic.****!
This is what you get for picking Victorian batsman!
Watto so good in interviews. Loved the facial hair aswell.
Yeah, because Warner was fantastic.****!
This is what you get for picking Victorian batsman!
Which of the top five do you not consider a batsman? Davies? Harsh I reckon; has a case to play in this team as a batsman alone tbh.Never been anything but
England win the game playing 4 batsmen
Meh. They'll get over it.Great cricket, worst possible result for the morale of the Aus cricket team.
would you like some fries to go with that ??I will eat my scrotum if Australia lose this.
Na, not in T20.I reckon it would've been worse for morale if they'd lost by 10 wickets with 14 overs to spare tbh.
Well when basically everyone else was OK (Johnson) to just rank poor, then you don'tYeah. When you hit 59 from 31 balls then take 4/15 from your four overs, you expect to win the game.
Lol. Well the good news is that Bell, Pietersen and Morgan won't score any runs in the next game.Na, not in T20.
Yeah i'm not gonna lie, I hated Watto before this tour. But after seeing the way he conducts himself to the press and in interviews and such I really am developing a soft spot for him. It helps that he's given us a few comedy moments as well, ie, "Awwwww no!"Watto so good in interviews. Loved the facial hair aswell.
Na, not in T20.Lol. Well the good news is that Bell, Pietersen and Morgan won't score any runs in the next game.
Almost all our players are like that really.Yeah i'm not gonna lie, I hated Watto before this tour. But after seeing the way he conducts himself to the press and in interviews and such I really am developing a soft spot for him. It helps that he's given us a few comedy moments as well, ie, "Awwwww no!"
Collingwood, I'd imagine.Yeah, because Warner was fantastic.
Watto so good in interviews. Loved the facial hair aswell.
It's just a massive tactical problem they've had for quite a while. They bat far too negatively and as a result don't make anywhere near full use of their resources. I thought losing Clarke from the side would have helped more than it did.Well when basically everyone else was OK (Johnson) to just rank poor, then you don't
I draw the line at Haddin though tbf. Wac.Almost all our players are like that really..
Dave Hussey took Clarke's place in the team in more ways than one.It's just a massive tactical problem they've had for quite a while. They bat far too negatively and as a result don't make anywhere near full use of their resources. I thought losing Clarke from the side would have helped more than it did.
I meant specialist batsmen. As Davis is a keeper batsman he doesnt qualify as a specialist. TBF, given Collingwood has a fair haul of T20 wickets then you could argue England only played 3 specialist batsman. That is dangerous and there is no need for 7 bowlers. Got a little lucky today but Wright really needs to **** off quicklyWhich of the top five do you not consider a batsman? Davies? Harsh I reckon; has a case to play in this team as a batsman alone tbh.