It is no doubt. Bond, Mills, Tuffey and Vettori are all really good and at one stage each of them would have been considered our best bowler. Just need to protect Franklin a littlet; only have Elliott to be the fifth bowler with him now that Ryder is injured.
Phew 667... 668... would have been my fault if there was a wicket obvOoooo, you're on 666 posts
He always looks good. But he always gets out
.
Normally long before this stage of the innings though.He always looks good. But he always gets out
I was talking about who Sri Lanka have to bowl and who the BC's have to bat.
Usually comes in a lot earlier too
If he beats the fielder the commentators all say "great shot, doesn't try to hit it too hard, just lifts it over the man". When he gets caught it's "stupid shot, didn't even try to hit it hard, just lofted it straight to the man!" You live by the waft, you die by the waft.
Very true. He has still lasted much longer than he usually does though.Usually comes in a lot earlier too
Where are people getting this idea from, that Frankling will save the BC's? When has he ever pulled them through? When has he ever done it with consistency? The guy is a myth and drops his shoulders quicker than anyone.Sir James of Franklin to lead us to victory
Hopefully he can pull off what Johnson did the other night
While that's often true, when the man is on the boundary just trying to chip it is a very dumb option.
Just pathetic from the BC's. Sure he is a canny bowler, but come on, that's a joke.
Some of the wickets were pathetic, but not surprised he went for so few runs as Vettori and Guptill needed to get themselves in.
It's called optimism
Can relax now we'll post something competitive no matter what.