Travis_Teh
International Regular
Seems fictiscious to me, you can't name names that don't exist. I've been at blue for 3 and a bit seasons, never heard anything of the likes.
I agree except it shouldn't be an internal punishment.Mister Wright said:There needs to be an investigation into this and IMO the players should be named and some sort of internal Blue punishment should be handed out.
What has it got to do with you Marc?marc71178 said:I agree except it shouldn't be an internal punishment.
Agree 100%PY said:What has it got to do with you Marc?
I can tell you, absolutely nothing. The ECB wouldn't hand out punishments in a situation like this, it'd be left to the club to do it.
True, it's not, but this situation is a little bit different to that of a real club. Everyone else was allowed to put in their opinions, why not Marc? I'm sick of seeing people around this forum constantly have a go at him just because he's outspoken.PY said:What has it got to do with you Marc?
I can tell you, absolutely nothing. The ECB wouldn't hand out punishments in a situation like this, it'd be left to the club to do it.
No you won't. I asked Liam who he'd want for Patrick and he said Kennett, and that there was no one else on Reds he'd want. Now Patrick's gun and all, but Kennett >>> Patrick. All Patrick wants to do is play for another team. He's never done a thing like this before and I'm sure he has fair reasons other than being dropped because Nath's not like that. You're denying him the chance to play for another club by trying to extort something extra out of the situation. If anyone's being held to ransom, it's Patrick.FaaipDeOiad said:CW Blue will look for a fair trade
A fair trade would be a bowler of equivalent talents. There's a number of people Camps would accept for him I'm sure, but we're hardly going to accept a massive loss. We'll hold out for a fair deal, simple as that. If Patrick wanted to leave the team without being traded he should have done it in the off-season.steds said:No you won't. I asked Liam who he'd want for Patrick and he said Kennett, and that there was no one else on Reds he'd want. Now Patrick's gun and all, but Kennett >>> Patrick. All Patrick wants to do is play for another team. He's never done a thing like this before and I'm sure he has fair reasons other than being dropped because Nath's not like that. You're denying him the chance to play for another club by trying to extort something extra out of the situation. If anyone's being held to ransom, it's Patrick.
Fair call, I (wrongly) took it that he was referring to all having a say in a suspension but he wasn't and I apologise for that. I came down (too) hard because his was the first suggestion that it was anything but an internal matter. I disagreed with what he said and you haven't justified at all why it's any different.David said:True, it's not, but this situation is a little bit different to that of a real club. Everyone else was allowed to put in their opinions, why not Marc? I'm sick of seeing people around this forum constantly have a go at him just because he's outspoken.
My money's on Demeza.FaaipDeOiad said:I can't imagine that a senior Blue player would do anything of the sort
Ahh, I didn't mean to imply that it was you specifically, it's just certain incidents I've seen round the forum in which a variety of people have made comments towards Marc which I found aggressive.PY said:And the dig about comments has nothing to do with me, I would like to think I'm on pretty good terms with Marc & I trust you'll have proof that I pick on him?
Was any of this needed? Why single me out? ****.Jamee999 said:Sean, was that needed in any way?
I agree with you which's why I found it bizarre I was 'singled out'.David said:Ahh, I didn't mean to imply that it was you specifically, it's just certain incidents I've seen round the forum in which a variety of people have made comments towards Marc which I found aggressive.
Black opening batsman Daniel Smith has since refuted all allegations, saying "I've never even spoken to Patrick outside of the environment of the Dev League. Sure, we've had the occasional chat at social functions, like at last years "Blonde locks like Bracken" day in Pickford, but I definately haven't communicated with him recently, or about anything to do with his decision to opt out of his contract at CW Blue. That's all I have to say."This is the first I'm hearing of this issue. I suspect that the Black player would be Blackman or Smith, but I can't think of who the Blue players will be.
This is evidently a fake. The real ARTHUR would not know a comma from a full stop.dontcloseyoureyes said:By ARTHUR
Patrick > Kennett in OD.steds said:No you won't. I asked Liam who he'd want for Patrick and he said Kennett, and that there was no one else on Reds he'd want. Now Patrick's gun and all, but Kennett >>> Patrick. All Patrick wants to do is play for another team. He's never done a thing like this before and I'm sure he has fair reasons other than being dropped because Nath's not like that. You're denying him the chance to play for another club by trying to extort something extra out of the situation. If anyone's being held to ransom, it's Patrick.
So you're saying Blue should trade off our best bowler for a bowler of lesser value purely to allow our best bowler to get playing time with another club in direct competition with us? And we're at fault here? Right.steds said:No you won't. I asked Liam who he'd want for Patrick and he said Kennett, and that there was no one else on Reds he'd want. Now Patrick's gun and all, but Kennett >>> Patrick. All Patrick wants to do is play for another team. He's never done a thing like this before and I'm sure he has fair reasons other than being dropped because Nath's not like that. You're denying him the chance to play for another club by trying to extort something extra out of the situation. If anyone's being held to ransom, it's Patrick.