Wasnt that stupid. Fleming just threw Taylor a HUGE dummyAnd here I was thinking that England (and Ian Bell) had the monopoly on stupid run outs...
55 isn't actually a very good average once reaching 20. Most top order batsman would average more than that. Really, he only averages an additional 35 runs once he gets to 20... which when compared to his actual average of around 32, shows that he isn't really much more "set" when he's on 20 than when he's on 0.I think you've got a firm grip on the Greigy there mate Pretty good stat that when Fleming gets more than 20 he averages around 55. Shows how succeptable he is to early LBW's.
Wasnt that stupid. Fleming just threw Taylor a HUGE dummy
7 an over is still pretty comfortable with 7 wickets in hand and 13 overs left.We could certainly use a good over or two - the run rate required has just crept over 7.
Healy is an IDIOT. Id be surprised if his IQ is in triple figuresThis commentary is driving me mad.
They show that Stephen Fleming's average when he scores more than 20 is 55 point something, and Healy goes "I'd like to compare that to Ricky Ponting's...it'd be better."
*permanently damages computer desk with fingernails*
This reminds me of the thread we had that criticised Tendulkar because his average when he failed to make double figures was 3.46 or something. Now that would be worth a dig.This commentary is driving me mad.
They show that Stephen Fleming's average when he scores more than 20 is 55 point something, and Healy goes "I'd like to compare that to Ricky Ponting's...it'd be better."
*permanently damages computer desk with fingernails*
Fair enough, I accept 4 to go for Flem's 100 PermI think you've got a firm grip on the Greigy there mate