well done i'm well and truly beaten by ur last post.So you agree he plays for records? Glad we settled it then.
time to move on
well done i'm well and truly beaten by ur last post.So you agree he plays for records? Glad we settled it then.
i don't know any clear example of a player's selfishness getting in the way of a test match win other than ponting's exampleSure, but I'm just wondering why you would question my post when you know the Tendulkar-Records issue all too well... my guess is just to troll around pointing out other irrelevant examples.
Anyways I'm really excited about this next match. 2 SC teams battling it out on a fast and bouncy pitch, whilst the Aussies just get to sit back and enjoy the show
Hello Mate,No doubt Tendulkar deserves to be in the side, he is a great player, as you said no one can replace him. But it's obvious he plays for records, there is just countless examples that have happened in his career which show this. Not much wrong with that of course, it makes you more determined to perform, but just saying it's there.
Haha no problem. India obviously have the advantage, but SL did well here last year unprepared. My guess is India will win. They key will be how SL bowl, because they used the conditions extremely well last year.Hello Mate,
Of course everyone, in all sports is about records I suppose. What I was refereing to was some 'stupid' comments on cricinfo about his 100th 100.
Well dude, I'm new on here, so how do you see the game going tomorrow?
Thank you.Welcome the wind.
That's my point Ding Dong. Everyone plays for records in one way or another (well maybe not Gilly, Warner and Sehwag as much as others). To single out Sachin is a bit silly.everybody does that though there's nothing selfish about it unless its the last few overs or something
Yep, a very good move by the Indian camp. Both in the long-term and short imo.India have said they're going to rotate their three openers so they give Rohit, Kohli etc maximum exposure to Australian conditions.
A good move IMO.
I agree he's been out of the side for some time, but do you recall, he once opened the batting in a test match. Point is that he has ability and he is now looking in really good condition, he has lost weight and I believe he should be given the rest of this series prove his worth. I saw him return after a while as you rightly say against West Indies in the recent ODI's. I felt he looked good, given the opportunity.Not too sure about Pathan. Hasn't been in the side for a long time. His bowling might be useful but can't really say the same about his batting.
Record of highest SRs(well maybe not Gilly, Warner and Sehwag as much as others).
Yes I agree. Not just that though, it also allows (in the future) to blend in other potential openers such as Rahane.India have said they're going to rotate their three openers so they give Rohit, Kohli etc maximum exposure to Australian conditions.
A good move IMO.
What? Players play the straight bat and say cliches when answering questions all the time.Yeah it isn't the most interesting debate, but that being said it is a good way to try and dislodge the halo that is often placed above Tendulkar's head. I definately think Tendulkar plays for 100's and records, but I also think every other elite player does as well. What irritates me is when Tendulkar acts a bit sanctimonious and tries to pretend he doesn't pay attention to them at all.