TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
omg you just don't listenLuke Wright being called a pinch hitter is self evidently stupid. He averages 40 in first class cricket and bats in the top 5. Anyone who thinks he is a pinch hitter is absolutely worthless debating as they lack enough knowledge of the subject matter to keep up.
A better example would be David Willey who opens for his domestic T20/List A side and could more accurately be called closer to a pinch hitter. It isn't a tactic used in T20, because as most astute observers of the game realise (including basically every professional team and all international teams) it is a waste to put a slogger up the order in the powerplay, as these overs need to be used by your best players. Indeed in T20 getting your best players in to maximise the deliveries they face is what the good teams do.
I didn't say Luke Wright was a definitively a "pinch-hitter". I said it was arguable. There's no Webster's dictionary definition of a pinch-hitter ffs, and if there was he would probably fit a few criteria.
If you're contention is that **** players shouldn't be used as pinch hitters then no ****, I don't think most people would argue with you. Using Sean Abbott as a pinch hitter was probably a **** move because he's a **** batsman and has been for a while.
tbh though it could have come off and any risk-benefit analysis would not be as one-sided as you think