Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sorta what I'm saying but not. I agree you don't pick bowlers based on what they're going to do with the bat but if you have 3 genuine 11's in the side, you better make sure your batters are likely to do the job unless those guys are going to take enough wickets to offset weakening the batting. Otherwise, you need to shore up the batting and I don't think batting O'Brien at 6 counts.I don't think the selectors can pick their bowling attack based on reliability with bat. Surely you just pick your best 3 quicks, and if they suck at batting, so be it, but you have to back your batsmen to make the runs. Whether or not those 3 guys are the best bowlers (I'm not convinced they are) is another story, but I don't think you can pick them based on runs scored at say number 9.
Sure the top 4 didn't have the most productive game but to be fair to them, the pressure's on when your number 6 is, really, a number 8. They're missing Manou badly with the bat and a potent new-ball partner for George.
Mind you, as I said, it's not as if the selectors had much choice. Batting's at one of the lowest ebb's I've seen in SA for some time. Two tons in the Futures, both of them in the first match. Geez. In the absence of guns with the ball, I reckon SA need guys to share the load over a few bowlers and they at least should be able to hold a bat. I'd be looking to blood Richardson in the next few games too.
Last edited: