• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia vs South Africa -2022/3

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Agar doesn’t turn his stock ball enough to succeed in Aus at test level, but either did SOK. Still think Agar would do a job in India
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This sounds crazy but if they're still in at lunch it might honestly be easier for South Africa to win than Australia.

Of course, Australia could (and might be more likely to) just kill the game if South Africa avoid the follow-on. But I think some captains would think about declaring after 2 overs and set a 4th innings chase.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
This sounds crazy but if they're still in at lunch it might honestly be easier for South Africa to win than Australia.

Of course, Australia could (and might be more likely to) just kill the game if South Africa avoid the follow-on. But I think some captains would think about declaring after 2 overs and set a 4th innings chase.
Mate…
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'll put it in another equation.

South Africa need 32 more runs to avoid the follow-on. It won't be straightforward but on current form they could definitely do it. Australia is really delivering nothing. Even if they do enforce the follow-on I think taking 10 wickets in 50 overs would be extremely difficult given the flatness of the pitch.

Australia then have two options. Do they bat out the day and condemn the match to a draw? Or do they declare pretty much straightaway and set South Africa 200 in 40 overs?

I know what you're thinking - South Africa can't really bat. But if you asked who was more likely to win if you set 200 off 40, you'd say the batting team. And all it needs is someone to slog a quickfire 70 and you might be in business.

I'm not saying South Africa will win. The Test is a near certain draw. But if Australia were to set up a run chase, I'd rather be in South Africa's camp than Australia's (with the caveat that even 200 off 40 would be more likely a draw).
 

Top