Black_Warrior
Cricketer Of The Year
Now that its getting dark..Ponting will bring in North from the other end who will destroy Pakistan..
I played Azhar Ali in International Cricket Captain and he started off really well with a gritty 70 in his debut match but disappointed big time since then..had to drop him after 4-5 test matches..Hope he scores that one gritty knock today
Everything is relative. Please suggest a lineup that is better at the moment than that? Also it is hard on South Africa, NZ (in NZ) and Sri Lanka to be considered second grade lineups, isn't it?Playing on roads against second rate seam attacks. Whoop-de-do.
Dravid is clearly past it. Laxman and Tendulkar maybe aren't past it yet but they're not at their prime.
That lineup is good not great.
There have been two Tests played against South Africa, in pretty flat conditions, since the start of 2009. Steyn managed to destroy that batting lineup in one of the games. The rest of the matches are against popgun seam attacks on pretty flat pitches. You've got matches against Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and New Zealand. The fact that the India lineup across the board averages so much in that period should tell you something.Everything is relative. Please suggest a lineup that is better at the moment than that? Also it is hard on South Africa, NZ (in NZ) and Sri Lanka to be considered second grade lineups, isn't it?
Also 7 out of those 10 tests produced results (India winning 6, SA winning 1) and one of them almost did (against NZ). Harsh to consider those as roads.
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | Cricinfo.com
Too harsh really. As barring Gambhir everyone in top 5 plus Dhoni averages above 50.
No but seriously what is it? Anyone knows?He's converted to Islam, planning on growing a Grace beard to boost his batting average.
He's converted to Islam, planning on growing a Grace beard to boost his batting average.
Calmn down lol, it's only a freakin tattoo.No but seriously what is it? Anyone knows?
Yeah, and it doesn't matter if we lose out on the matches that we play away as we play 70% of our games at home anyway and the thing that matters more for Indian batsmen is to be good on conditions where they play more. Not what they should play like on imaginary tracks that they are going to get once in a blue moon. Not saying that this **** is right btw, just the way it is.There have been two Tests played against South Africa, in pretty flat conditions, since the start of 2009. Steyn managed to destroy that batting lineup in one of the games. The rest of the matches are against popgun seam attacks on pretty flat pitches. You've got matches against Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and New Zealand. The fact that the India lineup across the board averages so much in that period should tell you something.
It's a completely different game coming up against proper seam attacks. It is a complete different playing away from the sub-continent.
Really! its a tattoo? I didn't know that...i thought some little fan of his who happens to be an Arab wrote that with crayons.....Calmn down lol, it's only a freakin tattoo.
http://austrolabe.com/2009/08/23/michael-clarkes-arabic-tattoo/
lmao.. Muhammad Clarke.
Don't be hasty, chief. That's what is explained in the link.Really! its a tattoo? I didn't know that...i thought some little fan of his who happens to be an Arab wrote that with crayons.....
I know its a tattoo...i wanted to know the meaning of what it says...
"Pretty flat conditions"? I beg to differ as both matches produced results. Unfortunately these guys can score only against the bowling attacks they face. You still haven't given whom you consider to be the better batting lineup in today's game.There have been two Tests played against South Africa, in pretty flat conditions, since the start of 2009. Steyn managed to destroy that batting lineup in one of the games. The rest of the matches are against popgun seam attacks on pretty flat pitches. You've got matches against Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and New Zealand. The fact that the India lineup across the board averages so much in that period should tell you something.
It's a completely different game coming up against proper seam attacks. It is a complete different playing away from the sub-continent.
He batted 5 in his 1st test against NZ - and then they moved him up to 3. I remember the commentators going on about how it was a terrible move - why would you move the guy after a great century on debut? Also his attacking mindset didn't go well at the number 3 position. Mind you, he was batting after Mohammed Yousuf in his first test. Politics in cracket - what a bitch ay?Because he is a sissy and doesn't want to face the new ball, get out early and screw up his average.....just my guess on why he is not being promoted to number 3....