• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia v Pakistan Test Series

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Originally posted by Gotchya
And yes another thing, for its impact on the match, that spell should have won him the man of the match award. Warne bowled well but the pitch was a major factor their, also that LBW decision (Younis) was uggghhh.... Australia just managed to escape.....hopefully the next match will bring better news :)
Warne took 11 wickets in the match - has to go to him.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Originally posted by devdas

It would be interesting to see how Aussie off spinner performs in the next test match.Jason is out with Injury and Aus doesn't have a good pacer to replace him so the spinner will definately play.
As things stand, McGrath and Warne will have to do bulk of the job.Lee is hardly impressive,but coz there isn't any good pacer, Aus are persisting with him.
Wonder what Aus would do if McGrath get injured??
Erm, Bichel isn't bad, and Williams is flying over - they will just replace Gillespie with one of those 2.
 

full_length

U19 Vice-Captain
Originally posted by marc71178
Originally posted by Gotchya
And yes another thing, for its impact on the match, that spell should have won him the man of the match award. Warne bowled well but the pitch was a major factor their, also that LBW decision (Younis) was uggghhh.... Australia just managed to escape.....hopefully the next match will bring better news :)
Warne took 11 wickets in the match - has to go to him.
plus Warne had more say in the match results. He took top order wickets in the second innings. Considering Pak's lower order, his performance was crucial to Australia getting home.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
From the little I have seen of Williams, he looks sharp.

I doubt very much whether he will play in the second test (it's far more likely that Australia will prefer Andy Bichel) but if that game goes Australia's way too, then we just might see him making his debut in game 3.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
From the little I have seen of Williams, he looks sharp.
Hell yes. Plus he has the real demon in him when he gets his back up. I should know; I still have the slight depression on the side of the head from when I faced him - and he was even quicker then.

Just watch out for a new left-arm quickie on the horizon, guys. His name is Mitchell Johnston and plays in Queensland. He's 20 I think and with 5 stress fractures in his back and coming off a four pace run-up, he got clocked at 138km/h. a couple of years ago...........he's SERIOUSLY quick and bowls a hooping in-swinger.
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
I've heard of him and he's supposed to be very talented...although how many times have I heard that about a young quicky who has then shown nothing of the sort! Williams has a career average of 30...yet an encon rate similer to Lee's...that doesn't really indicate a "spray it all around" bowler but more like a bowler who has to work hard for his wickets on perfect aussie tracks.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I've heard of him and he's supposed to be very talented...although how many times have I heard that about a young quicky who has then shown nothing of the sort!
I never said he was talented; just REALLY QUICK. :D

Williams has a career average of 30...yet an encon rate similer to Lee's...that doesn't really indicate a "spray it all around" bowler but more like a bowler who has to work hard for his wickets on perfect aussie tracks.
In the past yes but he's a much better bowler these days after having his career interrupted by injuries. Plus he's a fearsome hitter of the ball, as is Mitchell Johnston.
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
Oh if only Harmison could learn to slog a bit! I mean most fast bowlers either get a few runs slogging or none...Harmison bats slowly and blocks a lot...and still gets few runs...I reccon he could score quite a few runs if he just hit at the ball!

Ok of course Im not counting Hoggard as an attacking batsman...hes just about one of the most boring to watch!
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
Do the wickets in Sharjah assist pace or are they underprepared, break up and assist spin? For instance, what happened in the series between Pak and the Windies? I know Pak won easily, but were the pitches clearly suited to either pace or spin or were they sporting ones?
 

aussie_beater

State Vice-Captain
Originally posted by anilramavarma
Do the wickets in Sharjah assist pace or are they underprepared, break up and assist spin? For instance, what happened in the series between Pak and the Windies? I know Pak won easily, but were the pitches clearly suited to either pace or spin or were they sporting ones?
I saw the first test at Sharjah which Pak won after some inspired bowling from Shoaib Akhtar but it didn't look like there was any juice in that wicket as such....neither any significant assistance to the spinners and both the teams looked quite comfortable while batting till a late burst from Akhtar finished it in WI second innings.

It was a good batting wicket and held up for the full five days.
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
Thanks. In that case, barring Akhtar, I can't see anyone standing in the way of an Aussie victory.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Originally posted by Rik
Oh if only Harmison could learn to slog a bit! I mean most fast bowlers either get a few runs slogging or none...Harmison bats slowly and blocks a lot...and still gets few runs...I reccon he could score quite a few runs if he just hit at the ball!

Ok of course Im not counting Hoggard as an attacking batsman...hes just about one of the most boring to watch!
Is there anything wrong in numbers 10 and 11 batting for half an hour or so and allowing the bloke at the other end to score a few runs?

I don't think so - Hoggard's batting this summer was immense.
 

devdas

Cricket Spectator
[/quote]
Erm, Bichel isn't bad, and Williams is flying over - they will just replace Gillespie with one of those 2.
[/quote]

The wkt will most probably assist the spinners rather than the pacers, as such Huritz will be preferred over a new pacer.
 

Blewy

Cricketer Of The Year
I would have thought Watson would have been a perfect replacement as he also gives them the Batting ability...
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
No, no problem with them hanging around for an hour or so but Harmison doesn't even get the runs but with a bit of coaching he could score some, and Hoggard's batting was superb this season...just a trifle dull though ;)
 

Gotchya

State Vice-Captain
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by marc71178

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Gotchya
And yes another thing, for its impact on the match, that spell should have won him the man of the match award. Warne bowled well but the pitch was a major factor their, also that LBW decision (Younis) was uggghhh.... Australia just managed to escape.....hopefully the next match will bring better news
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Warne took 11 wickets in the match - has to go to him.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



plus Warne had more say in the match results. He took top order wickets in the second innings. Considering Pak's lower order, his performance was crucial to Australia getting home.

Juat trying to salvage something :rodent:
 

anzac

International Debutant
well Australia were lucky to get out of jail on that one !!!

another lower order / tail collapse to put some interest back into the match

I wonder how they would have gone had Dizzy broken down earlier in the innings or match?????? Me thinks the result would have been different - don't know that Pakistan would have won, but I don't think Australia would have bowled them out int the 2nd innings.....

I still maintain that the Australian team is 1 all rounder / part timer short at Test level - I do not count M Waugh, Ponting etc as back ups as they do not bowl often enough...abd they all tend to bowl gentle off spin - too much sameness!!!!

I believe every team should have an accurate medium pacer capable of holding up one end and taking the pace off the ball - from memory S Waugh did this in his early career as did Blewett, and as Astle does for NZ now.

I think their pace bowlers do not offer enough variety in attack when the pitch is flat and the batsmen are dug in - if there is little turn on a dead track then they hit a wall...

thankfully for Australia this does not occur too often - but I do think it is a flaw in their attack which the Indians were able to exploit in their wonderful home series victory......

:alien8:
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
Why doesn't Waugh bowl anymore? He's only 11 wickets off 100 test wickets and time is rapidly running out for him to reach that! Actually...I've never seen him bowl...
 

aussie_beater

State Vice-Captain
Australia is thinking of fielding five specialist bowlers for the second test due to the prospect of heat exhaustion affecting the bowlers.

Mark Waugh is likely to be dropped if that happens.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
I must say I can't see that happening - Gilly pushed up to 6 weakens the batting a fair bit, and they're one up in the series.

I reckon it'll be the same team with Bichel for Gillespie.
 

Top