Would be great.
**** Smith. Aussie called you "son". I think he's calling you out.
25 rounds in the Circle of Death.
Nah, I'm a fan.I could be misunderstanding you hear sir, but it seems as if you are suggesting if Watson does secure a spot in the Aussie side that way it would be a bad thing?
It was a joke you god damned idiot. It's exam time here in Australia.
Like the Twenty20s, would have Clark before Hopes and David Hussey in for Symonds who should rest for a bit longer. Have Watto bowl around six overs and give Clarke and Hussey one or two each.Would be great.
Still don't really get what the team's going to be if that happens though. Perhaps:
Watson
Marsh
Ponting
Clarke
Symonds
MHussey
Haddin
Hopes
Lee
Johnson
Bracken
That leaves Clark, White, DHussey and Ronchi on the bench.
The team looks a bowler short to me. I'm not sure what they were planning when it was meant to be Hayden there instead of Watson.
I kind of agree with you about Clark... but I was thinking of it from the selectors point of view that Hopes was fairly settled in that side in the last ODI match.Like the Twenty20s, would have Clark before Hopes and David Hussey in for Symonds who should rest for a bit longer. Have Watto bowl around six overs and give Clarke and Hussey one or two each.
Ie:
Watto (c)
Marsh
Ponting
Clarke
Hussey I
Hussey II
Haddin
Johnson
Lee
Clark
Bracken
Naa like pasag's lineup. Hopes is like a jigsaw, too many bits and pieces for me. Would prefer a dependable bowler like Clark.I kind of agree with you about Clark... but I was thinking of it from the selectors point of view that Hopes was fairly settled in that side in the last ODI match.
Have to say I'm not sure Ponting and Clarke would be too amused being ordered round by Watto, brilliant viewing though it would be.
AWTANaa like pasag's lineup. Hopes is like a jigsaw, too many bits and pieces for me. Would prefer a dependable bowler like Clark.
Am not disagreeing with that... I think four bowlers plus Watto/Hopes is best. I'm just wondering what the selectors are going to do.AWTA
its either Hopes or Watto.. not both.. imo
those two are good bowlers, but i wouldn't risk them having to bowl 20 overs between them
should play Fraz
yea im a big fan of Hopes but i understand that Watson is more of a matchwinner than Hopes - particularly with the bat... with the ball, i trust Hopes a lot more than Watson.. and i dont necessarily think Watson is better at 'taking wickets' than Hopes... but Watson as a batsman is exceptionalAm not disagreeing with that... I think four bowlers plus Watto/Hopes is best. I'm just wondering what the selectors are going to do.
Anyway... looks like Watto, confirmed by Ponting.
http://content-www.cricinfo.com/wivaus/content/story/355824.html
Although they were in 2020 Watson's recent performances with the ball far outshone Hopes, who was strangely very poor. Watto's bowling surprised every1 i reckon, great consistency taking wickets and economical to boot. Has to be in front of Hopes for a spot surelyyea im a big fan of Hopes but i understand that Watson is more of a matchwinner than Hopes - particularly with the bat... with the ball, i trust Hopes a lot more than Watson.. and i dont necessarily think Watson is better at 'taking wickets' than Hopes... but Watson as a batsman is exceptional
so im happy if Watson opens with Marsh
David Huss for Roy
and have 4 bowlers
"White's obviously been picked as the spinner on this tour, and he just happens to be a pretty handy batsman to go with it. We just need to keep exposing him to different situations and putting him under a bit more pressure. I think he's going to learn a lot from being under pressure more often … and hopefully he plays a big role for us during the series.
Well, this series will be the acid test, I would reckon. Doubt they'll be looking at him for a Test spot so if he bowls well in this series, reckon he'll be considered as Hogg's replacement.Ah well, as long as everyone had the chance to impress the IPL bosses ahead of the next season, they'll be happy
Anyways, a bit of a scary quote from Ponting: