benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
****, do you struggle to read posts or something?So you find this match boring.
I don't.
Click on my name on the left, then go to see posts then have a read through a few of my posts on the topic.
****, do you struggle to read posts or something?So you find this match boring.
I don't.
Ok, you meant the other way round? I haven't got time to go back and read your posts now, but I will later.****, do you struggle to read posts or something?
Click on my name on the left, then go to see posts then have a read through a few of my posts on the topic.
So the SCG doesn't exist any more?benchy I see your point wrt attractive cricket, but you so rarely see pitches that offer a thorough examination of a batsman's technique against a sharply turning/variably bouncing ball (as this one is) that a little variety for its own sake is handy.
It's not like you can't find bouncy, quick wickets in Aus, SA, England if you want to.
Yeah the SCG pitch for the India/SA Tests was great.So the SCG doesn't exist any more?
To me the SCG is everything a test cricket pitch should be.
TBF Trent Bridge can be a little like that, especially if it's overcast on day one. The toss was the key factor in India winning in 2007 (with apologies to Zaheer) and, although the good guys ultimately won, was instrumental in India taking a lead this dig too.Whilst I agree that there's a big double standard in attitudes there, I do think the main difference between those two situations is how crucial the toss is. You don't want the toss playing a key role in determining the winner, and pitches like this bring the toss into play a lot more than a South African seamer would.