Might be. No way in hell Clarke could or would have captained the ATG or even the immediate post-ATG side. Opinionated bloke he is, and that wouldn't have rubbed off well on the old-timers.That's half the side with a handful of matches between them. I wonder if Clarke prefers it that way, as it means gets to build his own side.
Still can't get my head around the Nathan Lyon selection. He has 14 FC wickets. 14.
yeah but he has 11 T20 wickets. 11That's half the side with a handful of matches between them. I wonder if Clarke prefers it that way, as it means gets to build his own side.
Still can't get my head around the Nathan Lyon selection. He has 14 FC wickets. 14.
Oh man, ideal team!!! So ****in' psyched, so is that 100% confirmed as the team playing tmrw Spark?
As good as we'll get.CricketAus Cricket Australia
Aus Team 1st Test @ Galle. Clarke, Watson, Ponting, Hughes, Copeland, Harris, Lyon, Johnson, Haddin, khawaja, Hussey. Beer (12th)
53 minutes ago
I don't care if either Lyon or Copeland are overawed. It's their first test and considering some of the very experienced players look like novices regularly (Johnson and Hussey to name two), no-one can hold initial nerves against them even if their first spell is complete crap.Well I still actually think Lyon has the potential to do quite well and actually take wickets (Beer not so much), but at the same time it would be his first test and he could quite conceivably let the occasion get the better of him. Lyon just needs more time in adjusting to the longer format, but I think in the long run he will be a pretty successful bowler. Beer on the other hand, while he is a decent bowler, probably will end up fractionally better than players like Doherty/Krejza. If Copeland debuts I hope he isn't burdened by the occasion either, but from the looks of things he is a pretty cool customer.
Yep its confirmed on cricinfo now too. Good times. Even if we don't win the match, it's good to know some right selection decisions have finally been made.As good as we'll get.
I don't see Lyon as a massive gamble. I don't see any of our spin bowlers as a massive gamble. You can only compare them with each other and it's all pretty much square there.Not a bad side tbh, out of the squad selected.
Lyon a massive gamble I agree.
As for naming the side early, I recall Waugh naming his team for a first Ashes test two weeks out.
Na I wouldn't hold it against them haha, I just mean from the point of view that it wouldn't help our chances of actually winning the match if they peform badly under the pressure of the occasion. Wouldn't blame them for it if they did.I don't care if either Lyon or Copeland are overawed. It's their first test and considering some of the very experienced players look like novices regularly (Johnson and Hussey to name two), no-one can hold initial nerves against them even if their first spell is complete crap.
Well, at least it would make a change from the headcase doing it.Na I wouldn't hold it against them haha, I just mean from the point of view that it wouldn't help our chances of actually winning the match if they peform badly under the pressure of the occasion. Wouldn't blame them for it if they did.
Will be very interested to see how the Sri Lankan's bat if Copeland and Lyon are bowling in tandem. Copeland probably won't give them much to hit, and they will probably try to go after Lyon anyway. Given the way Lyon bowls, I'm hoping for some quality stumpings!Copeland in the team he won't really need the spinner to tie up an end and bowl long containing spells; we can just use him to attack and Lyon's by far the more likely of the two of actually take wickets on a turning track IMO.
Depends on the batsman. From what I saw this summer, Paranvitana will be content to just rack up maidens against Copeland, deliberately playing inside the line for the one that comes back in. Dilshan will be more likely to use his feet to try and give himself room against the quicks.Will be very interested to see how the Sri Lankan's bat if Copeland and Lyon are bowling in tandem. Copeland probably won't give them much to hit, and they will probably try to go after Lyon anyway. Given the way Lyon bowls, I'm hoping for some quality stumpings!
You had better hope that Haddin is concentrating very hard then. He never looks quite right against spin. My impression is that he lets many byes through.Will be very interested to see how the Sri Lankan's bat if Copeland and Lyon are bowling in tandem. Copeland probably won't give them much to hit, and they will probably try to go after Lyon anyway. Given the way Lyon bowls, I'm hoping for some quality stumpings!
True, true. I'm hoping Copeland actually causes enough trouble though that they feel like they have to attack Lyon. They could well destroy him (!!), but it will make for some pretty exciting cricket nevertheless. Looking at the weather forecast for Galle, looks pretty ominous... could be some serious swing on offer for the quicks.Depends on the batsman. From what I saw this summer, Paranvitana will be content to just rack up maidens against Copeland, deliberately playing inside the line for the one that comes back in. Dilshan will be more likely to use his feet to try and give himself room against the quicks.
Is that why the ball goes between his legs a lot? It's embarrassing to watch him sometimes.more concerned about his hands slipping too far forward rather than byes
I think the weather isn't going to assist with a result in any of the tests.Ugh forecast looks terrible. That would explain the draw odds...
Odds on a result have actually come in from yesterday. When I commented on it cricketbetlive had the draw as odds on, now it's up to 2.12.Ugh forecast looks terrible. That would explain the draw odds...