That's all stats though. He has looked terrific despite his lack of runs, which is exactly why the selectors stuck with him. And it payed off.
EDIT: And he hardly scored them slowly.
It
kind of paid off...
We lost the series that he played in 4-1 and lost the first game against NZ.
So 1 win and 5 losses for the games he played in - certainly not his fault, but his batting style isn't a "game winning" style.
Haddin at the top of the order produced some 'game winning' innings in that he scored quickly and went on with the job to make the 100.
As I've said before, Sean Marsh suffers from concentration lapses - which seriously hinder his ability to be a top class player. He's made 4 first class centuries in his 50+ game career. He just vagues out way to often.
And watch him in the field in the ODIs - there were numerous occasions this summer where he was standing by vacantly as the ball cannoned into the fence some 10m to the side of him. The commentators generously gave him the 'sun in the eyes' excuse - but if it happens several times in a summer, and only ever to one player - a player who has a history of spacing out - it's more likely that he lost concentration in the field too (he didn't move 1 step - normally 'sun in the eyes' guys put their hands in front of the eyes and shuffle around like goons... )
Having said that, Sean Marsh made a couple of scores - but they weren't dominant scores or match winning scores.
In 6 games he put on 233 runs at a SR of 74.
If the Aussie team is going to have a moderate paced opener who they want to lean on to be the 'backbone' of the innings, then surely Michael Clarke is the logical candidate? Sean Marsh won't go on and make a big hundred - Clarke/ Haddin to open, Ferguson down the order to accelerate makes more sense.
I would've thought Philip Hughes might've snuck ahead of Marsh in the selectors estimation now anyway? There's a replacement if Clarke can't play who can also make the big scores and pace the innings.
I realise I'm arguing uphill against Marsh here considering the quick start he's made to his ODI career - but it flies in the face of his domestic performances and it'll be shocking if he keeps it up.
I'm pretty certain it won't, hence I don't see the point in picking him until he's in the kind of form where he makes runs - not the kind of form where he looks good, scores slowly and doesn't make runs...
Time will tell I guess!