vic_orthdox
Global Moderator
Very different having a low economy rate as the best bowler of your side, who has been leading the attack, to the bloke who is the fourth or fifth bowler in the side.
Last edited:
Seen, well thats the only good excuse those selectors could have for not picking him.Bracken didn't play the last Shield game; he's presumed injured (even though there's some evidence to suggest he actually isn't).
I read in some article about David Warner that Bracken was back in the team this week after missing the last match for personal/family reasons.Bracken didn't play the last Shield game; he's presumed injured (even though there's some evidence to suggest he actually isn't).
Word GSeen, well thats the only good excuse those selectors could have for not picking him.
But I'm fed up with them cats already yo, they should be sent to guillotine already dawg...
frealzWord G
Wouldn't have Morkel in there, the seam cupboard isn't that bare and why do we need an Andrew McDonald anyway? An ODI player at best is Albie.. Drop Morne to 11 and hopefully he'll be hurt enough to knuckle down with his batting
Dont worry about the fact that we couldnt bowl anyone out in 15 days let alone 5Yes! Magoffin.
Will have the best tail if Geeves and Magoffin play.
I think he can handle a bat, IE he has the talent to contribute, not saying majorly, but to contribute.. But he just totally lacks the discipline, kind of like a Darren Gough with the bat I thinkLooked pretty good in the ODIs, so you're being harsh to say at best. He won them a couple of games. He's not dissimlar to McDonald who did a good restricting job with the ball for us. McGain would have struggled to be as tight and who knows if he would have taken wickets. The number of injuries to bowlers is astounding. Morne should drop to #11, he looks like he can't handle a bat and he's not a thinker with bat or ball.
Fail to see how that's relevant.Dont worry about the fact that we couldnt bowl anyone out in 15 days let alone 5
Haha, so now I've heard that, injury, him not being able to get to the ground and the obvious. So frustrating.I read in some article about David Warner that Bracken was back in the team this week after missing the last match for personal/family reasons.
Well I guess personal reasons would be an explanation as to why there wasn't anything concrete.Haha, so now I've heard that, injury, him not being able to get to the ground and the obvious. So frustrating.
We need them to take wicketsFail to see how that's relevant.
Oh,We need them to take wickets
Imagine a bowling lineup of Johnson, Magoffin, Geeves, McDonald and North
On paper, that's the worst attack I can recall
Just returned after a serious back injury.whats up with that De Wet bloke?
This. Hoping it's coming good in time for the game, same with Hilfenhaus. I've already assumed Bollinger no chance to play.Just refusing to accept that Siddle won't be fit for the second test atm, personally...
Yeah, would really be a huge blow if either Hilfenhaus or Siddle miss out on the next game, would just kind of kill any momentum the Australian team gained through the win in the 1st test.This. Hoping it's coming good in time for the game, same with Hilfenhaus. I've already assumed Bollinger no chance to play.
McDonald is a lot better than Hauritz as a bowler. In the two tests he's played he's kept it tighter than any spinner reasonably could, and chipped in with big wickets in every innings he's bowled in. The conditions suit him much better, and he can hold a bat. And if the pitch isn't turning medium-pace is a much better "change-things-up" idea than spin because the ball will actually move quite a bit more.Just out of interest... what did Nathan Hauritz do wrong? I know he's not a superstar in the making, but I thought he did a reasonable job in the tests he played in Australia, and also iirc he had strong performances for his state this season. I would have thought he was someone who could play a holding role and take a few wickets, much like MacDonald but giving a bit more variety and bowl a few more overs if necessary. If they weren't going to play spinners, why did they bother to take two of them on tour?