alternative
Cricket Web Content Updater
Nnanden said:Page 119...
...
A 5-for on debut? Couldn`t be...
that was almost a 5-for clark..
but not to be, as warney dropped a dipping chance..
Nnanden said:Page 119...
...
A 5-for on debut? Couldn`t be...
what site are you talking aboutandyc said:'daputtar: AUS IF WARNE IS GREAT HOW COME HE AINT GOT NO FMAILY AND HOW COEM HE ONLY BOLWS WELL AGAINST EN'
I love this site...
Why is Symonds bowling now for Kasper when Warne's only had one over?? He should keep applying the pressure, not take it off by letting Symonds bowl (cue Symonds wicket).
Cricbuzz.comSlats4ever said:what site are you talking about
He`s got a few to nip back pretty well.SJS said:Symonds really is very very ordinary as a bowler for test matches.
That same tool also seems think Andre Nel can bat.Nnanden said:We have a winner!
"Aussies dont have a genuine fast bowling alrounder like Agarkar. thats been their problem over the years"
EDIT: "recently they tried shane watson. but he is nowher near agarkar`s class"
Nnanden said:We have a winner!
"Aussies dont have a genuine fast bowling alrounder like Agarkar. thats been their problem over the years"
EDIT: "recently they tried shane watson. but he is nowher near agarkar`s class"
Don`t forget Ntini. Up there with Boje.TT Boy said:That same tool also seems think Andre Nel can bat.