TT Boy
Hall of Fame Member
Friday prayer.Is there a reason this session seems to be running OT?
Friday prayer.Is there a reason this session seems to be running OT?
Friday prayers.Is there a reason this session seems to be running OT?
*Shafique, FFS. I thought your favorite, the original Rahane, had staged another comeback.Shafiq has been tied down for a while now.
I think I read something about the PCB saying that he was 16 in 2016? If his DOB is accurate, then he would've been 13 back then....Nah, Naseem looks most likely to be somewhat near the age they claim on his certificate.
Where did I say that though? I think Agar is a better option to get wickets and to keep runs down on this track than one of Starc/Hazlewood. That is all. Its why I said it was a common sense decision. Also, the SLA angle always adds a little more of a question at the batsmen instead of a bunch of right arm offies and leggies.so I wouldn't say this is a turner.
I guess I just don't rate our backup spinners very highly and guess they would be a good chance of struggling. YMMV.Where did I say that though? I think Agar is a better option to get wickets and to keep runs down on this track than one of Starc/Hazlewood. That is all. Its why I said it was a common sense decision. Also, the SLA angle always adds a little more of a question at the batsmen instead of a bunch of right arm offies and leggies.
Probably been said before, but he did his best work with the new ball when the seam was still hard enough to grip and then looked more innocuous. Doesn't look like it's going to be as hard to play spin on this pitch as it initially looked, although two spinners was still the best option IMO.ITBT I'm not really sure that Agar/Swepson would be taking wickets either. If Lyon was like 1/20 off 12 then yes, that would be a clear cut case of not having enough spinners in the side. Lyon's been played pretty well here so I wouldn't say this is a turner.
Granted he has had a few chances and I guess Agar in particular might be more effective in the subcontinent than Australia?
They may well be, and it would be silly to play 3 or whatever but I still think you need two spinners in these conditions more than you need your 4th seamer, unless he is Windies quartet level good and I dont think these guys are that good.I guess I just don't rate our backup spinners very highly and guess they would be a good chance of struggling. YMMV.
Yeah they'll at least build pressure and keep them honest. Dunno if you can expect the same from seamers on this deck.They may well be, and it would be silly to play 3 or whatever but I still think you need two spinners in these conditions more than you need your 4th seamer, unless he is Windies quartet level good and I dont think these guys are that good.