And the other bowlers did? Only Arnel did anything and even that was after they'd had their fun.*insert token comment re: Vettori can't take wickets against batsmen who actually want to stay in*
But seriously though...seriously...
It's not exactly like Hauritz had a brilliant game with the ball either.*insert token comment re: Vettori can't take wickets against batsmen who actually want to stay in*
But seriously though...seriously...
Of course they didn't.And the other bowlers did? Only Arnel did anything and even that was after they'd had their fun.
Vettori isn't a strike bowler. Reckon we all know this, great at building pressure and if he has someone at the other end he can make the batsman make a mistake. Without Bond in the team I don't think the pressure cooker style of bowling is going to have a good few years.Of course they didn't.
But we are comparing Dan "world class" Vettori with a bunch of complete chumps *popular opinion mode*
Of course the larger point is that Vettori has been failing miserably in this regard (i.e. the regard of being a bowler who takes important wickets) for 13 years
You are right - I would have gone with Hussey on review.Ponting in as captain TBH. Vettori was decent throughout but Ponting is coming in to a decent phase of his career now. Also reckon if you chose that team pre series you wouldn't choose North and possibly McCullum. Only Vettori and Taylor really look world class.
Vettori doesn't usually come through in the 2nd inning. He has some type of mental block.*insert token comment re: Vettori can't take wickets against batsmen who actually want to stay in*
But seriously though...seriously...
That's quite euphemistic. Vettori is moderately difficult to score off but calling it a "pressure cooker" style of bowling is seriously overselling him.Vettori isn't a strike bowler. Reckon we all know this, great at building pressure and if he has someone at the other end he can make the batsman make a mistake. Without Bond in the team I don't think the pressure cooker style of bowling is going to have a good few years.
On the otherside of the coin I think he is a better limited overs player than he ever has been.
Overselling? Thats exactly how he gets wickets, forces the opposition to give them up. This far far far more frequently happens when our attack is half decent when it's Vettori alone he is poor. Also I think you misunderstand my use of the word pressure cooker. Just as bad for NZ as it is for the opposition. The steam will burst out one way or another, a wicket or plenty of runs.That's quite euphemistic. Vettori is moderately difficult to score off but calling it a "pressure cooker" style of bowling is seriously overselling him.
Last test? No. Selector Vettori on Cricinfo (Daniel Vettori faces same old problems | Cricket News | New Zealand v Australia 2009-10 | Cricinfo.com):Patel: not a test no.8.
Patel: last test?
"Jeetan tends to dominate at that first-class level and he's a very good bowler. Sometimes when he is in and out of the team it is difficult so with some Tests coming up on the subcontinent that is his real opportunity to shine."
"Jeetan tends to dominate at that first-class level"Last test? No. Selector Vettori on Cricinfo (Daniel Vettori faces same old problems | Cricket News | New Zealand v Australia 2009-10 | Cricinfo.com):
Was the leading wicket taker up to Christmas, and most dominate spinner in first class. Still eventually averaged 35 or so IIR (pre new year it was 27)"Jeetan tends to dominate at that first-class level"