99*
International Debutant
FFS. If it's McIntosh.... rage.
Bollinger. Didn't even look at the umpire.
EDIT: Ah, appeal, I see. Stupid cricinfo being slow.
Last edited:
FFS. If it's McIntosh.... rage.
Bollinger. Didn't even look at the umpire.
Extras will need to ton up if we're going to come close here. He's been in good form lately though.Nice start by extras here. Looking for a strong contribution from that performer in this innings.
Lol Athlai, clutching at straws isn't it?Patel > Martin in this match.
See following sentence.Lol Athlai, clutching at straws isn't it?
I didSee following sentence.
I'll be stoked if they put on 70 again like they did in Wellington.Reckon this is our best opening partnership in a long time, neither are the greatest of batsman but both just seem like they can stick around and do the job. Happy with an opener averaging 30 after having so many abject failures in recent years.
Statistically it's our best since Richardson left. Partnership records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | Cricinfo.com
Hauritz has a average of 26+ not only in tests but ODI's also.Dunno if I'd say Hauritz is that much better than Jeets with the bat. Neither are Test match #8s though.
Would take the 30 overs they batted out there over the 70 runs.I'll be stoked if they put on 70 again like they did in Wellington.
Would you say that if they batted for 30 overs and only scored 55 runs?Would take the 30 overs they batted out there over the 70 runs.
Can't see him keeping it.Hauritz has a average of 26+ not only in tests but ODI's also.
Definitely. McIntosh has a knack of staying in after he has faced 70 odd balls so would look to kick on from there.Would you say that if they batted for 30 overs and only scored 55 runs?
Why? he has done it consistantly over a couple of years, what do you think he lacks as a tailend batsman. He can defend exceptionaly well and is able to hit the sixes when required.Can't see him keeping it.