• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in Ireland and England 2015 (limited overs)

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Technically out, wonder if all sides would have gone through with the appeal then.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Should have done hawk eye to see if the ball was really hitting the stumps. I guess the way Stokes runs between wickets, Starc may have had a chance to run him out even if it missed, and then Wade being Wade missed and Starc got the rebound and hit.
 
Last edited:

Niall

International Coach
Technically out, wonder if all sides would have gone through with the appeal then.
NZ might not have but that is because bmac is lovely. The rest? Dunno maybe Holder would have said no?

To be fair no blame on SMith whatsoever, he was out.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
What have I missed?

The fallout from this could be fun.
Stokes was about 4-5m out of his crease. Starc hurled it at full pace back at the stumps and looked on-target, would have run him out if he had hit. Stokes went to simultaneously evade and dive back at his crease and in doing so more or less caught the ball mid-air.
 

hazsa19

International Regular
Not a chance was that wilful obstruction. Smith will cop a load from the English press but the umpires had a shocker imo.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Eek, Smith'll want to do better than that if he's going to stand there full time. Got nowhere near that.

Didn't matter, though.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Easier to argue he was out handled the ball imo, though he should still have got the benefit of the doubt
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Easier to argue he was out handled the ball imo, though he should still have got the benefit of the doubt
Yeah this was my initial thought, but wouldn't that run into exactly the same question? IIRC the caveat in both laws is identical.
 

Top