silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Dhoni MoM? All right, this batsman fetish has gone way too ******* far. Disgusting. I'm going to sleep.
Yeah it's not so much that people didn't rate Zaheer when they said that; Franklin is just criminally under-rated. The fact that he hasn't played in ages due to injury makes him hard to rate at this point in time but I don't think Zaheer is conclusively better as such.Would still prefer Franklin to Zaheer, tbf.
I can confidently conclude he's nowhere near as studly as Zaheer.Yeah it's not so much that people didn't rate Zaheer when they said that; Franklin is just criminally under-rated. The fact that he hasn't played in ages due to injury makes him hard to rate at this point in time but I don't think Zaheer is conclusively better as such.
You have to admit that his captaincy was pretty good too.Dhoni MoM? All right, this batsman fetish has gone way too ******* far. Disgusting. I'm going to sleep.
Your team just won by 320 runs. Are you ever going to be happy?Dhoni MoM? All right, this batsman fetish has gone way too ******* far. Disgusting. I'm going to sleep.
Did you personally confirm the studliness??I can confidently conclude he's nowhere near as studly as Zaheer.
Franklin's prettier though.I can confidently conclude he's nowhere near as studly as Zaheer.
But India would still probably have won without Dhoni. Could they have won without Mishra, or one of the seam bowlers? I am not convinced. Isn't that the definition of a man of the match?You have to admit that his captaincy was pretty good too.
Yeah, shocking decision to give Dhoni man of the match. Expected, but still shocking. Would have even preferred Gambhir got it TBH.But India would still probably have won without Dhoni. Could they have won without Mishra, or one of the seam bowlers? I am not convinced. Isn't that the definition of a man of the match?
Would they have won without Dhoni?? I am not too sure. All his decisions were more or less spot on. And he led from the front. Batted as the game demanded in both innings. promoted himself in the second innings.But India would still probably have won without Dhoni. Could they have won without Mishra, or one of the seam bowlers? I am not convinced. Isn't that the definition of a man of the match?
Need a hand removing your pecker from his pocket?Brilliantly said mate, completely agree with every word of your post.
Need a hand removing your pecker from his pocket?
Need a hand removing your pecker from his pocket?
But that was before they had Mendis and in your home conditions wasn't it?Facing SL in SL with Mendis in their side is different by quite a bit,imo.Australia recently thrashed SL
I think you'll see a period where a number of teams of capable of beating the other (which, btw, is a good thing)
In fact, I'd back Eng to beat India in December - they have a much better bowling attack than either of the teams playing here
Indeed. I'd back Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka to cause Australia as many problems as India in India TBH.But that was before they had Mendis and in your home conditions wasn't it?Facing SL in SL with Mendis in their side is different by quite a bit,imo.