And I've also just noticed it was a 14-a-sider, so it has no meaning at all.telsor said:The same thought occured to me when I noticed that the A side used 10 bowlers in the second innings.
That said, if it works, then surely it counts as a good tactic..after all, the game was there to get the test side ready for the first test.
And it's all gone about as well as I'd have hoped.Deja moo said:Aus vs Mum is in Mumbai ( no , I'm not at the stadium)
They weren't showing on DD?Deja moo said:The match was in Bangalore...as was the team selection.
Aus vs Mum is in Mumbai ( no , I'm not at the stadium)
Not over the Ashes and Test series between Pakistan and India?Richard said:And it's all gone about as well as I'd have hoped.
All the Aus bowlers hit their stride (McGrath esp), only the part-timers are expensive - all the batsmen get some time at the crease.
This match is First-Class, and just doubly assures that we don't get any "so-and-so was out-of-form".
We're all poised for the start of the joint-biggest Test-series in cricket.
Yes, I really mean that.
The Border-Gavaskar Trophy, along with the Basil D'Oliveira Cup, is cricket's best-contested competition over the last decade or so.
marc71178 said:I can't help but raise my eyebrows at the way the A side were well on top and then seemingly lost it against a paor of batsmen that needed runs to boost their confidence ahead of the Test series...
age_master said:what do you expect though, they cant have the A side knock of the seniors a week before one of the biggest test series of their lives.
Not with this telecast rights nonsense. All I got to watch were bits and pieces of older footage taken from what could be a private camera, and the angle was incorrect. It got footage from one end, and stayed at the centre for long, so I couldn't identify which end. It had bits and pieces of commentary, too.Sehwag309 said:They weren't showing on DD?
But isn't that always the case ? Someone from the bottom five has to come good.Arjun said:One of the bottom five from the Indian team has to step up as a batsman if they have to have a good chance of winning the series.
It has rarely or never happened for the Indian team. IF the top 6 have scored a large total, someone must tell one of the bottom five, especially Pathan or Harbhajan, to bat for a 50 or more, at a good strike rate.But isn't that always the case ? Someone from the bottom five has to come good.
I wonder what would have happened if that were Australia playing Australia A?age_master said:what do you expect though, they cant have the A side knock of the seniors a week before one of the biggest test series of their lives.
Because it is that easy to do against McGrath and co isn't it?Arjun said:It has rarely or never happened for the Indian team. IF the top 6 have scored a large total, someone must tell one of the bottom five, especially Pathan or Harbhajan, to bat for a 50 or more, at a good strike rate.
not easy...but not impossible, marc...especially if the top 6 have scored a lot, there is a very good chance that the bowlers are a little down and the tailenders can swing their bats around more effectively....marc71178 said:Because it is that easy to do against McGrath and co isn't it?
Still, those 2 should be batting in the top 6 for the next 5 years, just in case one of them belies their current records to become and all rounder
may be something similar??marc71178 said:I wonder what would have happened if that were Australia playing Australia A?
Actually I am sorry, I was thinking about the "top" five while replying to a post where you mentioned the "bottom" five. My bad.Arjun said:It has rarely or never happened for the Indian team. IF the top 6 have scored a large total, someone must tell one of the bottom five, especially Pathan or Harbhajan, to bat for a 50 or more, at a good strike rate.