Only temporarily. He's never got a permanent job, and he should (or some other man for the job of a bowling coach), since the team needs one, till they have a world-class bowler in their ranks. As for their main coach, John Wright must realise that he has 14 players to work with, not just the specialist batsmen.Craig said:I thought that was Bruce Reid's job to work with the bowlers?
I would pick him, his consistentcy is the problem.Arjun said:WHat do you do with Zaheer? He's had a decent match against the Indian A team, and has picked up 8 wickets in 2 matches with an average slightly over 20, so he's not doing too bad. The main worry is not his bowling, but his fielding.
Exactly, I think he would've been worth keeping....Craig said:So India doesn't employ a fast bowling coach? Strange considering the good job Bruce Reid has done for them.
Exactly. His Test averages over the years have not been great (his best was in 2002, at 29), but he's a lot better in ODI's, as he had averages of 22 in 2002 and 23 in 2003. Once again, if he should stay ahead of other contenders, who are not far worse, he should improve his ground fielding.Craig said:I would pick him, his consistentcy is the problem.
Waughney said:Exactly, I think he would've been worth keeping....
And rightly so.Andre said:Which is why he has been hired again.
If Tendulkar plays Yuvraj will open, if he doesn't play Chopra will open & Yuvraj in the middle order. Or that's the way I see it at the moment.Craig said:Chopra
Sehwag
Dravid
Tendulkar (Yuvraj if Tendulkar isn't fit)
Laxman
*Ganguly
+Patel
Pathan
AA/Zaheer
Harbhajan SIngh
Anil Kumble
12th man: Mohammad Kaif
Not a bad guy to have in at number 11 with Anil Kumble.
I can't help but raise my eyebrows at the way the A side were well on top and then seemingly lost it against a paor of batsmen that needed runs to boost their confidence ahead of the Test series...Eclipse said:I see Shewag has smashed 34 runs plus a no ball of an over in the India Vs India A match lol..
The same thought occured to me when I noticed that the A side used 10 bowlers in the second innings.marc71178 said:I can't help but raise my eyebrows at the way the A side were well on top and then seemingly lost it against a paor of batsmen that needed runs to boost their confidence ahead of the Test series...
Craig said:Yeah but obviously crap bowling.
I wish I would have been able to see it.
Deja moo said:The bowler reportedly was Murali Karthik ....
Anyone knows if that over happened before or after Karthik was picked in the team ?