I guess you aretooextracool said:whether i am grumpy or not is frankly none of your business, this is a cricketing forum and im not going to talk about any sort of techniques that make anyone less grumpy.
the point that i made was that not very long ago there were people talking about how india had solved their problems outside the sub continent etc. and now when they lose on pitches that offer something for the quicker bowlers, they blame the groundsmen for it. if you cant win when you play on these sort of pitches then how exactly do you expect to win abroad?
Sanz said:89.3 Gillespie to Kartik, no run, wide outside the off stump, no shot
offered, low bounce, Gilchrist fails to collect it cleanly
Uh oh, Poor keeping by Gilchrist, he must be dropped from the side.
I totally agree that Parthiv cant be blamed for being selected AND that India wpould probably have lost anyway. This is not to say that his keeping has been anything short of pathetic.Sanz said:I have never defended his wicket keeping, but the everyone has been jumping on him as if he is the main reason for India's woos. It is the collective failure of Indian batting, If Pathiv should be dropped because of his wicket keeping , so should be Laxman, Chopra, Ganguly, Dravid and Yuvraj. They have failed as well.
Moreover, putting so much pressure in the middle of a TEST is really stupid. Parthiv didn't force anyone to be selected in the team. Mr. Kirmani who is criticizing Parthiv so much persisted with him for 3 years as long as he was the chief selector, So did Mr. Azad.
On the other hand Parthiv has batted very well and I think he should be played as a batsman and it is Laxman who should be dropped before anyone.