• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in India 2023

Senile Sentry

International Debutant
Marnus has looked rock solid and been our leading scorer so far this series (not a massive bar tbf) and a majority of his dismissals have been from balls that I don't think he could have done much about,

Smith's issue is that he's not following the methodology that made him so good last time we toured here. Smith of 2017 wouldn't have been caught dead getting beaten on the inside edge playing for spin vs jadeja 2 innings in a row like he did in the 1st test.
Disagree on Marnus.He was struggling to pick up the lines and lengths especially today off Ashwin. Ashwin could have easily got him 2 or 3 times, including an easy bat pad that was dropped by Iyer.

He was going backward to one's he should be going forward to. And then despite Ashwin giving plenty of signals as to the pitch staying low at a particular length, he chose to hang back. He was completely worked over by Ashwin in that 18th over. Jadeja just came in the next over, and bowled a 100 kph one (as compared to Ashwin s mid to high 80s) which just as Ashwin didn't rise up from a similar length. Labu was still lying back, stupidly and couldn't adjust to the pace of the ball.

I found Smith to be relatively better as he was atleast wearing some of the deliveries on the bat than lunging forward but still was getting flummoxed by Ashwins lengths. And then he played the most atrocious sweep , nowhere near pitch or line of the ball and got out. But then again, the previous deliveries sort of pushed Smith into playing that to break shackles.

It is basically two all time great spinners going about their work in tandem like Naatu naatu (RRR). And they have come a long way from 2017 in terms of skillets and application of talent. For me that's the biggest difference. Ashwin has had the mental upper hand over Smith since Adelaide 2020 whereas Jadeja has had his number in the last match by getting through him twice. Smith is a bloody good batsman and I hope he counterpunches one in the next 4 innings. He ought to atleast for cricket sake.
 

Manee

Cricketer Of The Year
India are simply fantastic at home and in Jadeja and Ashwin, with pitches prepared to help them, they keep running through the opposition for fun.

As much as it pains me, I think the Aussies are the best test team in the world but let's be honest, it's men against boys in this series.

No team has the batting to to cope with Jadeja and Ashwin. Yes the Aussies could have done better, and maybe their selections haven't helped but let's not kid ourselves, it wouldn't matter who they picked - India at home are too good - and this isn't a great Indian batting line up.

In these conditions Jadeja and Ashwin are 2 ATG spinners and I'm not sure even a world 11 would beat them.
Hard to say that for sure. Australia were doing just fine until they absolutely imploded today with their sweep/reverse sweep strategy. I think if they had a quality pacer instead of the SLA bowler and a less suicidal strategy today with the bat it could have been close.

Also worth mentioning that Ashwin has performed fairly well but Jadeja has been a God and without him (a lot of variables I know), then this would have been an Australian win, imo.
 

Sunil1z

International Regular
What's there to hype? Our domination started from Oz 2013 series but this was (arguably) the biggest turning point for us in the course of 15 series wins at home. I also don't expect us to win that overhyped one off test in Eng.
I don’t think it is overhyped. We should try our best to win it.
 

Senile Sentry

International Debutant
Did Mark Waugh really left home due to his verbal spat from DK ? Is he really that soft ?
He left com box immediately though, and Hayden came in, while Bhogle and DK stayed.

DK was no angel, he was being a Senile Sentry trying to provoke a Burgey type there. But would have expected a bit more professional response fro Waugh. Will be surprised if he ever gets another comm gig outside of his den.
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
1.Usman
2.Head
3.Marnus
4.Smith
5.Handscomb/Green
6.Green/handscomb
7.Carey
8.Starc
9.Cummins
10.Lyon
11.Murphy
i'd go

Khawaja
Head
Labuschagne
Smith
Green
Maxwell
Carey
Starc
Cummins
Lyon
Hazlewood

Murphy's role can be split between Maxwell, Head, Smith and Labu. Murphy is just not threatening at this stage of his skills development. Analysts have clearly devised a strategy for him already in the indian side. All debutant offies in india look good for one debut test.
 

Senile Sentry

International Debutant
The former probably.
Yeah his batting was, but his commentary was the latter though. Spouted nonsense and when countered resorted to silly comebacks.

He did challenge DK about the latter s prediction of India batting just once. So there is a bit of banter initiated by him.
 

Daniel CC

School Boy/Girl Captain
He has the height and can extract more of that uneven bounce with his bowling. Plus he won't do any worse than Australia's 6th/7th batter (Renshaw).

Shami took 4 on this wicket while Siraj looked so threatening. So Australia have to play their best bowlers (pacers) and especially the only genuine all-rounder
If that height and uneven bounce are in play then why hasn't Cummins been more effective... or why hasn't he bowled more?
 

RossTaylorsBox

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah his batting was, but his commentary was the latter though. Spouted nonsense and when countered resorted to silly comebacks.

He did challenge DK about the latter s prediction of India batting just once. So there is a bit of banter initiated by him.
Languid means more like physically weak, doesn't really make sense in terms of commentary.
 

Top