No. Pujara averages like 33 or so outside of India. If memory serves me correctly, Kohli is in the 40s. Idk about Rahane. Needless to say Pujara is excellent at home but pretty useless outside India.well done pujara. has he edged ahead in the 3 man race as the best test bat out of him, virat and rahane now?
Nah, it was India's game before Vijay got out around 190/1, right now its dead even, Australia probably ahead given that India bat last and our tailhasn't contributed much at all this series. Pujara needs to match Smith and our lowe order needs to step up big time.Aus have leaked too many runs here. At 160/1, game was still theirs, but the last two hours have really opened it up.
I dunno, I've always found it a downer."Love it when he comes down"
Chennai showed more that he bats well against bad bowlers, tbf.Hope their bowlers are tiring out. Nair can score quickly against tired bowlers like he showed in Chennai. Should look to score 120 in the final session. If we are still batting at close, Jaddu can blast some declaration runs tomorrow.
He won us a series in SL mate. And averaged 70 in a series against Steyn/Philander overseas, He's a unique sub-continent-SA bully.No. Pujara averages like 33 or so outside of India. If memory serves me correctly, Kohli is in the 40s. Idk about Rahane. Needless to say Pujara is excellent at home but pretty useless outside India.
Depends on what the conditions are tbh... If there is pace and bounce in the wicket, you would have to pick Kohli. Plus even though he has been **** this series, Kohli has improved a lot at playing in India.I prefer Pujara over Kohli. I see him as the pivotal player in the Indian batting line-up.
Reminded me a bit of Steyn somehow. But that may just be because I miss Steyn.Does Cummins remind anyone of a young Jason Gillespie? Has the same slingy release and general ball trajectory at similar speeds too.
Some big differences, for mine. Unlike Dizz, is prepared to throw it up there to swing it and actually possesses a threatening bouncer. Dizz rarely swung it, generally bowled big cutters.Does Cummins remind anyone of a young Jason Gillespie? Has the same slingy release and general ball trajectory at similar speeds too.
Yeah overall, Kohli is better by a fair bit. But Pujara has been far more important to our success in home conditions. Even if he ends his career as a bit of an HTB, I won't mind much as long as he continues producing these runs on tough pitches /clutch situations.Depends on what the conditions are tbh... If there is pace and bounce in the wicket, you would have to pick Kohli. Plus even though he has been **** this series, Kohli has improved a lot at playing in India.