• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in India 2017

Shri

Mr. Glass
Ashwin and Jadeja were bowling a bit too short which is why Starc was effortlessly able to hit them in leg side. Aussie spinners have been much fuller.

So what now? Will Smith go for follow on or bat us out of the game?
What? We are not allout for 60.
 

CricAddict

Cricketer Of The Year
Ashwin and Jadeja were bowling a bit too short which is why Starc was effortlessly able to hit them in leg side. Aussie spinners have been much fuller.

So what now? Will Smith go for follow on or bat us out of the game?
He can't do even if he wanted to. Follow on limit is 200 runs.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ashwin and Jadeja were bowling a bit too short which is why Starc was effortlessly able to hit them in leg side. Aussie spinners have been much fuller.

So what now? Will Smith go for follow on or bat us out of the game?
159 runs ahead....
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ashwin and Jadeja were bowling a bit too short which is why Starc was effortlessly able to hit them in leg side. Aussie spinners have been much fuller.

So what now? Will Smith go for follow on or bat us out of the game?
Follow on is 200 and even then, don't think they'd want to bat in the 4th innings even if they're chasing 150.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Besides which, even if they were 300 ahead, no Aussie skipper has enforced the f/o since Chennai, right?
 

Top