Gnske
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
And a guillotine for RahaneNext match changes - Bhuvi for Ishant and Nair for Jayant?
And a guillotine for RahaneNext match changes - Bhuvi for Ishant and Nair for Jayant?
To Rahul as well.And a guillotine for Rahane
While I thought he bowled very well and was unlucky, this is a fair point. A bit like how Bob Simpson said for years Bruce Reid kept bowling too short of a length and while he bowled well, beat the bat and got wickets, he didn't really get the big bags he should've. Once he started pitching it up more in the 1990s the big hauls came.If India make more rank turners, they may again be shocked. This, falling to visiting spinners on a track made for an easy Indian win, is not the first time it has happened.
Secondly, our spinners, particularly Jadeja, appear satisfied with beating the bat again and again. Jadeja did not bowl well enough to exploit a track tailor made for someone like him. He bowled just good length or marginally shorter. And kept beating the batsmen with the turn. When a wicket turns that much you need to pitch up slightly further up so as NOT TO MISS THE EDGE. If you keep missing the edge and bowl over after over in the same way you are not doing a great job - and he wasn't.
Australian spinners pitched up further and the Indians were forced to play forward much more than the Australians were.
They, the Aussie batsmen (particularly Smith) played back a lot and were able to avoid nicking it even though the turn and bounce that jadeja got seemed to make it look as if he was going to get a wicket any ball.
This is bad bowling on a turning track.
Worst defeat since against England in 2012I've seen people compare this to Lord's 2014 but that test was extremely well contested for all 5 days. To lose the first test at home this badly is pretty astonishing.
And bring in whom? Parthiv? Mukund? Good luck.To Rahul as well.
Bad spin bowling, yes, but not because of the reasons you mentioned. Jadeja's problem was not the length but his line considering the massive turn he was getting. He was always bowling it a bit too outside the off stump when he should have been straighter to get the edges by balls that were ripping past. And Ashwin kept releasing the pressure with too many boundary balls that were too short for this track.If India make more rank turners, they may again be shocked. This, falling to visiting spinners on a track made for an easy Indian win, is not the first time it has happened.
Secondly, our spinners, particularly Jadeja, appear satisfied with beating the bat again and again. Jadeja did not bowl well enough to exploit a track tailor made for someone like him. He bowled just good length or marginally shorter. And kept beating the batsmen with the turn. When a wicket turns that much you need to pitch up slightly further up so as NOT TO MISS THE EDGE. If you keep missing the edge and bowl over after over in the same way you are not doing a great job - and he wasn't.
Australian spinners pitched up further and the Indians were forced to play forward much more than the Australians were.
They, the Aussie batsmen (particularly Smith) played back a lot and were able to avoid nicking it even though the turn and bounce that jadeja got seemed to make it look as if he was going to get a wicket any ball.
This is bad bowling on a turning track.
Bhuvi for Ishant. Can't do worse and can bat.And bring in whom? Parthiv? Mukund? Good luck.
No need to gut the whole team. Jayant was a weak link throughout the test... Nair in for him is the only real change we should make.
I am ok for either Ishant or Bhuvi but it should be Nair for Jayant and Mukund for Rahul. Mukund has been in very good form recently and Rahul is not dependable at all. Also, Mukund brings in with him few extras like being a left hander and having been involved in large opening partnerships with Vijay for Tamilnadu. I don`t remember when we last had a 100 run partnership for the opening wicket.And bring in whom? Parthiv? Mukund? Good luck.
No need to gut the whole team. Jayant was a weak link throughout the test... Nair in for him is the only real change we should make.
Yea too many changes is not the solution.And bring in whom? Parthiv? Mukund? Good luck.
No need to gut the whole team. Jayant was a weak link throughout the test... Nair in for him is the only real change we should make.
I'd drop him if he sucks next game too and we lose that as well tbh.Yea too many changes is not the solution.
I'd stick with Rahane for the entire series and see how he does. If he doesn't perform well then serious questions should be raised after the series.