Nuffy said:Have they changed the LBW law, Bucknor has a strange interpretation on it, yet again Eng get the benefit of a questionable decision.
Flintoff was on 8 when he was give a life by Bucknor, so its cost us 50 already.
Who said this series wasn't about destiny for Eng, they've had any amount of good luck.
If you Australians somehow produce the Flintoff "LBW" (hit on the line of leg stump, to what looked like a slider, 4ft down the wicket) as the turning point then it will go down as the greatest whinge in historyNuffy said:Have they changed the LBW law, Bucknor has a strange interpretation on it, yet again Eng get the benefit of a questionable decision.
Flintoff was on 8 when he was give a life by Bucknor, so its cost us 50 already.
Who said this series wasn't about destiny for Eng, they've had any amount of good luck.
No, the painters come in before a new bowler comes in and paints in the name. Then, when the commentators have made their point, they run back in and paint it green again.ltzergling said:Are the words on the oval on the bowlers ends where it says the name of the bowler added by computer or?
They only seem to come up every now and then.
The problem is that the umpires seem unwilling to give any LBW's to Warne, theres been any number during the series and yet they won't give them to Warne.PY said:
I think there was enough doubt for not out, if he'd have given that I think England fans would have been as up in arms as you guys are now which shows it was touch and go which in itself means it can't be given. Plus we've had 15 replays.