Nah, I'm sure we were all quite happy to express the same sentiments and more when Glenn decided to test his ankle ligaments.Pedro Delgado said:Poor show!!
(I can understand it but).
Nah, I'm sure we were all quite happy to express the same sentiments and more when Glenn decided to test his ankle ligaments.Pedro Delgado said:Poor show!!
(I can understand it but).
Let's just say I wasn't crying in me soup Okay then, fair dos.andyc said:Haha yeah. Tell me you weren't happy when McGrath was out!
Yeah but I didn't tell anyonegreg said:Nah, I'm sure we were all quite happy to express the same sentiments and more when Glenn decided to test his ankle ligaments.
Not really. Bell's the better batsman, and contrary to popular belief, the better bowler too. Certainly in first-class cricket, anyway - Bell's first-class average is only 1 run higher than Simon Jones'!shaka said:I reckon drop Bell and place Collingwood, more options with him there, as I think he can bowl too.
Too much like brett leeSlow Love™ said:Wow, I'm really glad Jones is out - rain aside, our chances of evening up this series just jumped significantly. I'd like to see Hodge in for Hayden in our lineup (another right-hander in the order) and Katich up to open, but it won't happen.
The negativity around James Anderson (with some it obviously approaches contempt) is so surreal to me - I lost touch with him during his loss of form, and my opinion of him from what I'd seen earlier was that he was very decent. He may surprise, if they play him.
Luckily for us (and him) some of the poop ones occasionally take wickets - I remember a couple of West Indians lobbing half-volleys to cover, and a couple of Saffers middling it to gully in the past year or so.SpaceMonkey said:Too much like brett lee
He'll bowl you a brillent potential wicket taking ball 5-6 times a day but the rest of the balls in between are poop!
Ah, fudge. That's really bad news.Pedro Delgado said:Just on Sky Sports News, Jonah is officially out of the Oval Test.
Clicky
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
mmhmm, nice self-defeating argument there...Barney Rubble said:Not really. Bell's the better batsman, and contrary to popular belief, the better bowler too. Certainly in first-class cricket, anyway - Bell's first-class average is only 1 run higher than Simon Jones'!
Let me guess - I've failed to spot that Colly's FC batting average is higher than Bell's, haven't I? Bugger.Scaly piscine said:mmhmm, nice self-defeating argument there...
I would find it hard to believe that Collingwood would have been worse than Bell has been this series if he'd have played in his place. (Cue marc to go on about how unlucky he has been to face so many unplayable deliveries which were mostly decent deliveries that Bell made appear to be unplayable, he's kind of like the reverse of a great batsman who turn decent deliveries into 4s)
You going on about FC averages, then mention that Bell's FC bowling average is only 1 run higher than the taff's FC bowling average.Barney Rubble said:Let me guess - I've failed to spot that Colly's FC batting average is higher than Bell's, haven't I? Bugger.
EDIT: No, that's not it - Bell's is 11 runs higher than Colly's. OK, I give up - how is my argument self-defeating?
Nope. I don't get it either. Unless it's a point about how meaningless FC averages are.Barney Rubble said:Let me guess - I've failed to spot that Colly's FC batting average is higher than Bell's, haven't I? Bugger.
EDIT: No, that's not it - Bell's is 11 runs higher than Colly's. OK, I give up - how is my argument self-defeating?
Ah well, at least the cogs are turning... slowly.greg said:Nope. I don't get it either. Unless it's a point about how meaningless FC averages are.
I still don't get it - the first mention of FC averages I made was that Bell's average was only 1 run above Jonah's, and that was just to illustrate how underrated Bell's bowling is.Scaly piscine said:You going on about FC averages, then mention that Bell's FC bowling average is only 1 run higher than the taff's FC bowling average.
Except you're basing who is better simply on FC average as there's nothing else in Bell's favour to put Bell ahead of Collingwood, because anyone who's seen Bell play this summer would see his batting is worse than Collingwood's. Bell is a Ramprakash waiting to happen if he doesn't improve.Barney Rubble said:I still don't get it - the first mention of FC averages I made was that Bell's average was only 1 run above Jonah's, and that was just to illustrate how underrated Bell's bowling is.
To put my point in other words, IMHO Bell is the better batsman which means Colly shouldn't replace him, and there's no sense including Colly as an extra bowling option because we already have Bell in the team, who could do that job better than he could.
"North-East England" wouldn't happen to be Durham, would it? The only times I've seen Collingwood bat this summer was in the ODIs, where (like everyone else) he looked extremely uncomfortable first up against McGrath, but spent most of the time batting against Symonds and Hogg. So not really much scope for comparisons.Scaly piscine said:Except you're basing who is better simply on FC average as there's nothing else in Bell's favour to put Bell ahead of Collingwood, because anyone who's seen Bell play this summer would see his batting is worse than Collingwood's. Bell is a Ramprakash waiting to happen if he doesn't improve.