Oh I know that, but what I was pointing out was that some people were getting carried away purely based on the speed he was bowling, and not looking at how well he bowled in that first spell.King_Ponting said:By the end of this test, we shall see.
PY said:And they are done....I would say that it was England's day by 55-45% but that's as good as even really.
One crumb of comfort I got today was the swing Tait was getting at times (added to the bowling of Ponting - if he can move it both ways then I fancy someone like Hoggard to be effective.FaaipDeOiad said:Please note this ball is 30 overs old. Ricky, give him the cherry next innings.
That's the first time he's been dismissed for a low score that hasn't been a super ball IMO.Scaly piscine said:Bell turns a decent line & length delivery into a wicket-taking one (again).
To be fair, my initial thought was "missing"Slow Love™ said:LBW call just now hit outside the line, but lots of umpires will give it out when no shot's being played.
Have to say I liked Ather's reply about some of the Aussies being partial to a bit of crumpet.Slow Love™ said:Richie's talking about how much things have changed since he played, at the meals breaks - pasta, carbohydrates etc. But a bit of crumpet at the tea break does seem a more dramatic change.
So, with McGrath injured and Gillespie woefully out of form, which person would you have put into the side as the 5th bowler and who would he have replaced?Pratyush said:I am afraid the current Aussie attack is very weak and looks unlikely to take 20 English wickets before dismissing England cheaply in two innings. They did require 5 bowlers (a gamble but Australia really do not have a choice).
I loved his face when it happened - genuine disbelief!age_master said:which, considering the pitch, i dont think the Aussies will be to unhappy with.
and ponting claiming the wicket i dont think Vaughan will live that one down for a while
ha well you should have seen Lara face when Ponting got him out in the VB series a few years agomarc71178 said:I loved his face when it happened - genuine disbelief!
oh well same thing their as well....marc71178 said:I was actually talking about Ponting's face.
Now that is a fluke...FaaipDeOiad said:It's thrilling to see a guy I've liked so much in domestic cricket bowling the same way on debut. He certainly seems to be up to the occasion.
Incidentally, Gilchrist is now, I think, the fourth wicket keeper ever to get 300 test dismissals.
Oh! LOL! My bad!marc71178 said:Tresco's was on 110-1
The no ball made it Nelson.
I think Tait was really good , after an average first spell. He didn't do much wrong at all after that, aside from occasionally straying a little when searching for swing, and both his wickets were completely deserved.The Argonaut said:England must get over 400 or they have wasted the first chance on this pitch. They have the batting left to do this. I thought that Lee bowled poorly and lacked his usual aggression and spark. Tait was raw as expected and was worth the gamble. Kaspar needs a change up ball that goes into the left handers if he is going to be successful.
An even first day.