Err yeah, okay. Because Australia scoring 200 odd with 7 wickets in hand was really implausible, wasn't it?Shane Warne said:Oh come on, fence sitter.
It's obviously more like 95-5 England at least.
In these circumstances and in this game...Yes.FaaipDeOiad said:Err yeah, okay. Because Australia scoring 200 odd with 7 wickets in hand was really implausible, wasn't it?
Well done Nostradamus.Shane Warne said:Nah. It was too obvious.
I'd drop him too.social said:And another Aus gives his wicket away.
Couldnt believe that Vaughan would actually give Hoggard a bowl at this stage (Flintoff must be injured), He serves up a half volley and Martyn says "no, that's crap, I'll hit it to mid-wicket rather than for 4 as Ive done thousands of times before."
Absolute rubbish from Martyn for the second time in the match.
And me, and TEC. Not sure about Corey, but a few of us did.Samuel_Vimes said:Heh. Wasn't T_C the guy who predicted Katich to get a mass of runs this series? England haven't won yet...
Glad to see you're a brilliant selector as well a prophet. Dropping Australia's best batsman in the last 12 months is inspired stuff.Shane Warne said:I'd drop him too.
163 is way too close for comfort. *shivers*FaaipDeOiad said:And me, and TEC. Not sure about Corey, but a few of us did.
Katich is all class, but there's a lot to do.
lol u really didn't have to respond to that seanFaaipDeOiad said:Glad to see you're a brilliant selector as well a prophet. Dropping Australia's best batsman in the last 12 months is inspired stuff.
It would be if they did it yeah.FaaipDeOiad said:Glad to see you're a brilliant selector as well a prophet. Dropping Australia's best batsman in the last 12 months is inspired stuff.
Now there's a surprise. Hold the back pages.Scaly piscine said:Giles has been pathetic so far in this innings,