Harmison destroys that hope...Nnanden said:C`mon, under 150, please. Please...
Hear, here.Somerset said:They seem to be putting more effort into bowling at the head of the tail, rather than the stumps ATM...
Nnanden said:Bugger this. Ice-cream it is. Ice-cream, then bowling in the garage.
All over now though but as you say, extremely entertaining section of the match!_Ed_ said:This is good stuff from a neutral perspective! Great shot by Harmison off Warne just before.
I am. Is that sarcasm? `Cause I actually liked the Channel Seven coverage. Instead of trying to be serious, they enjoyed it all. Kerry was on the money.Slow Love™ said:Also, for those watching on SBS (if there's anybody besides me, that is), don't Jones and Matthews' local interludes suck in comparison to Squires, MacGill and O'Keefe? Deano's just such a tosser.
WTF are you on about..man you can talk some crapScaly piscine said:Bull, the ball moved all day yesterday (mostly seam movement anyway and a little bit of new ball swing) - Australia have had the added advantage of 2 grubbers that took care of Vaughan and Flintoff. I suppose the pitch appearing to get better is probably just the ball getting older.
It often caused them more problems than the top order with the likes of Vettori and Franklin down the bottom...but interesting coincidence.Blaze said:IIRC something similar happened when NZ played AUS.. they struggle to nail the tail sometimes
Somerset said:If the ball moved around the entire day yesterday, Australia's advantage should be down to their skill rather than their luck in winning the toss. The two balls that Vaughan and Flintoff faced could easily have occured in Australia's innings anyway - after all, the deliveries happened only ten overs after Australia were all out.