Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
So, when Marsh was hitting the mid-high 130s in the Ashes... what happened to that?
I don't really care much about these awards, but I think I'd have given it to him, just because he got the main men out, yeah Archer was the one who probably looked more dangerous, but Woakes as ever just did the job in a none flashy way, said it before but he always seems to be doomed to be over-looked by more striking individuals.From the scorecard it definitely looks like Woakes deserved the motm.
Not only did he break the partnership that was winning Australia the game, he took the wicket of both set batsmen.
Those 20-odd runs were pretty crucial too.
He's genuinely good value for them in the lower middle order. I didn't watch it much longer than when Buttler went, but in a low scoring game, Woakes' efforts looked to be the difference tbhI don't really care much about these awards, but I think I'd have given it to him, just because he got the main men out, yeah Archer was the one who probably looked more dangerous, but Woakes as ever just did the job in a none flashy way, said it before but he always seems to be doomed to be over-looked by more striking individuals.
Not sure too much can be attributed to home advantage in a ‘bio bubble’.Yeah scraping in against a side that hasn't played for 6+ months while playing at home on the back of a full season's prep is the sign of an outfit screaming along on eight cylinders.
Qwality analysis brain.
Playing tons more cricket recently and playing on familiar home pitches isn't home advantage?Not sure too much can be attributed to home advantage in a ‘bio bubble’.
Morgan specifically requested wickets they aren't used to that would prepare them for the next WC in India.playing on familiar home pitches isn't home advantage
Tons more? Have the England white ball cricketers even played that much? I actually don’t know.Playing tons more cricket recently and playing on familiar home pitches isn't home advantage?
In any case, England is a better ODI team full stop, but this was a pretty bad throw regardless.
Important runs tooNo I’m not. Woakes was taking wickets at the other end triggering the collapse with Archer and got both key wickets. I watched the entire game kid. Woakes’s 3 quick wickets plus Archer’s wicket at the other end changed the game. Australia were 144-2 and Woakes took 3rd, 5th and 6th wickets.
This just comes down to Archer fanboying when Woakes deserved it weighing up the facts. Both got three important wickets but Woakes got two super key ones, better figures and 26 runs. No brainer for me that Woakes is motm
They had T20s against Ireland and Pakistan before this. Also a reasonable few domestic fixtures compared to their counterparts who only had intra squad matches.Tons more? Have the England white ball cricketers even played that much? I actually don’t know.
And personally don’t see pitches as being much of an issue in one day cricket.
Indeed, not sure which countries fans are taking it overtly seriously though.Beggars belief people can't admit England has the advantage in game time and home ground. I mean its just a fill in series, England. No need to take it so seriously.