He'd also be getting wickets though.KaZoH0lic said:LOL. If it was Murali, I know a handful of people who would quickly reply..."Can't you see he's injured, what a travesty! A great sportsman in pain, giving his all, and still mocked."
Sorry to make it seem so demeaning, but it actually does happen.
He's also not playing.Jono said:He'd also be getting wickets though.
KaZoH0lic said:I think Warne has a case, maybe not so much that the Bangladesh AREN'T enough competition, but that the season is filled up with too many games.
Lol, apologies I was on the previous page and just clicked the quote button.vic_orthdox said:He's also not playing.
....seriously guys, really toeing the line here.
Well, Richie Benaud and Geoff Boycott are retired and they are not going to play cricket against Bangladesh. Warne is still playing, he should have shown little more respect for BD.FaaipDeOiad said:I suppose you think Richie Benaud and Geoff Boycott should give up their careers as pundits as well, since they said the same thing at the same time? How about, say, everyone else who said it?.
Ironically Warnie didn't say this when Bangladesh were poor, he said this after they started improving. Warnie insulted Bangladesh and thank god Cricket gods were listening.In reality, Bangaldesh were a woefully poor team for almost 5 years. Since around the time Whatmore took over they have been gradually improving, and in the last 12 months they have been consistently competitive, but there's nothing at all wrong with suggesting that before that they weren't good enough to play test cricket, because they weren't.
Okay, first I'd like to point out my following post doesn't have anything to do with Murali.FaaipDeOiad said:I suppose you think Richie Benaud and Geoff Boycott should give up their careers as pundits as well, since they said the same thing at the same time? How about, say, everyone else who said it?
In reality, Bangaldesh were a woefully poor team for almost 5 years. Since around the time Whatmore took over they have been gradually improving, and in the last 12 months they have been consistently competitive, but there's nothing at all wrong with suggesting that before that they weren't good enough to play test cricket, because they weren't.
I know you're only in here to make fun of Warne, and I'm sure everyone expected it, but at least stick to his bowling figures.
Beat me to the punch it seems!Sanz said:Well, Richie Benaud and Geoff Boycott are retired and they are not going to play cricket against Bangladesh. Warne is still playing, he should have shown little more respect for BD.
Ths has nothing to do with Warne vs. Murali though. It has to do with Bangladesh's test status.dontcloseyoureyes said:Are you guys just flat out ignoring the mods for fun or what? This is 100% annoying the hell out of everyone.
Well, as long as we can keep Murali out of this thread, it should be okay. Bangladeshi fans have all the rights to quote Shane Warne and every other guy who has made fun of their cricket in last few months.dontcloseyoureyes said:Are you guys just flat out ignoring the mods for fun or what? This is 100% annoying the hell out of everyone.
Take note: it is possible to mention that something may be a contributing factor, without it being an excuse for the performance as a whole. Australia are coming off a ridiculously long summer of cricket, and a 5-0 win over South Africa. They've arrived off about 4 days rest in foreign conditions in another part of the world and walked straight into a test series against a side that are playing better than all reasonable predictions. Yes, Australia underestimated them, but one of the reasons that happened is that the tour was scheduled as a warm-down after a big period of cricket in the lead-up to the Ashes next summer, rather than a proper test series. Had there been two weeks rest instead of a couple of days, and perhaps a tour match, you likely would have seen a fresher and more motivated Australian team on the first morning, and it's less likely that Bangladesh would have gotten away to a flier.C_C said:Tiredness ? oh do better !
Warne, like most of the aussie playing XI, seriously underestimated the Bangladeshis and as a result, got clobbered.
Excuses Galore.FaaipDeOiad said:Take note: it is possible to mention that something may be a contributing factor, without it being an excuse for the performance as a whole. Australia are coming off a ridiculously long summer of cricket, and a 5-0 win over South Africa. They've arrived off about 4 days rest in foreign conditions in another part of the world and walked straight into a test series against a side that are playing better than all reasonable predictions. Yes, Australia underestimated them, but one of the reasons that happened is that the tour was scheduled as a warm-down after a big period of cricket in the lead-up to the Ashes next summer, rather than a proper test series. Had there been two weeks rest instead of a couple of days, and perhaps a tour match, you likely would have seen a fresher and more motivated Australian team on the first morning, and it's less likely that Bangladesh would have gotten away to a flier.
Mentioning that Australia looked flat and tired on the first day and that their two key bowled have been run into the ground in the last six months is not an excuse, it's just part of the reason Australia began the test so badly.
Err...Jono said:Its more the fact that 2 weeks ago it would have been claimed that Australia A would have beaten Bangladesh with their eyes closed that makes the fatigue argument silly. In fact its been claimed Australia A would be one of the 4 best test nations in the world, forget just beating the Banglas.