Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
Lol, I mentioned Dan's glasses one minute after yours. A bit harsh on big Ashley there though His grey hair is probably the issue.chaminda_00 said:Lets add to the list there Vettori wears glasses and Giles is just ugly.
Lol, I mentioned Dan's glasses one minute after yours. A bit harsh on big Ashley there though His grey hair is probably the issue.chaminda_00 said:Lets add to the list there Vettori wears glasses and Giles is just ugly.
pffft....... You know what you REALLY need? The all round abilities of the awesome AA....Nnanden said:Two scenarios seem likely from this point...
1) - Warne on 99, pulls it towards mid-wicket off Rafique, Ashraful takes a sitter, bows to the crowd, man in stadium throws his hat around in a violent rage. Later, findings show Rafique actually bowled a no-ball, creates much controversey.
2) - Australia fly in Dave Mohammed, he takes 10-for, Bangladesh out for not many, Australia win Test Match.
Enamul Haque jnr your man, apparently the girls think his hot too, well thats what my girlfriend says, but then again she think im hotJono said:I forgot to add, big bad Daniel Vettori, as cool as he is, doesn't qualify for he wears glasses. The same goes for Giles, but replace glasses with sunnies, and add 'grey hair'.
Not even close. It is obvious that he was responding to a taunt from Warney and I honestly think he has held himself in check very well there and didn't go overboard as others might have against such provocation.Dasa said:http://www.theage.com.au/news/crick...er-warne-claims/2005/12/31/1135915726063.html
Not quite the same as what Warne does...
Dan's actually a big man, he sure looks it up close in person. I'm sure he can fend for himself.Loony BoB said:Hey man, you can't pick on a guy with glasses. That goes against kindergarten rules. I'm telling my mum on you.
We got it. The problem is that once we got "it", we didn't want "it" anymore.Jono said:LOL! Please someone tell me they got the pun there.
Lets see what the 3rd umpires says first...Jono said:However Enamul Haque jnr has me stumped for the moment though.
.
Harsh but fair.silentstriker said:We got it. The problem is that once we got "it", we didn't want "it" anymore.
Why isn't that close? From his reaction it sounds kind of girlish:honestbharani said:Not even close. It is obvious that he was responding to a taunt from Warney and I honestly think he has held himself in check very well there and didn't go overboard as others might have against such provocation.
Uh, no it isn't mate.Murali said:"That is Shane Warne's opinion only"
Cheap or not, a test wicket is a test wicket in statistical value only. When all those wickets go under the broad banner of "Bangladesh" you can see why Warne has an objection.Murali said:"You can't say 'cheap wickets'. He hasn't done well in India. I have done very well in India. A Test wicket is a Test wicket."
As opposed to what you just said...?Murali said:"I still think he (Warne) is a great bowler. But I think he is under pressure because I might catch him, especially with him saying things like that."
Bangladeshis already have it in the bag, no point even chatting about it now.Loony BoB said:So, how about that Aussie vs. Bangladesh game?
Loony BoB said:So, how about that Aussie vs. Bangladesh game?
No they don't, no they don't!Jono said:Bangladeshis already have it in the bag, no point even chatting about it now.
That's blesphemy .silentstriker said:Can you imagine? The aussies might be hoping for a bit of rain!