Here's their description of all six balls in the most recent overIt's so bad
Bowls both. He's basically the Bangladeshi Andrew Symondsdidn't nasir hossain used to bowl mediums?
To be fair, they have now updated those balls with comments...the commentary runs at a lag compared to scoreHere's their description of all six balls in the most recent over
Nasir Hossain to Renshaw, no run,
Thanks chaps, really tells me loads.
A raging alcoholicBowls both. He's basically the Bangladeshi Andrew Symonds
Yes he does - top three need to break the back of it here, Australia (or non-subcontinent teams in general) lose too many quick wickets to spin on wickets like this. Openers are crucial.Warner doesn't need to anchor a chase. He just has to provide a flying start and knock of a chunk of the runs in no time
Urgh bad feeling about this. BD doesn't do comprehensive wins. Everytime they're in position to assert their dominance they throw it away -_-
just needed to also bowl legspin to be Bangladeshi Sachin TendulkarBowls both. He's basically the Bangladeshi Andrew Symonds
Yes as conclusively proven when they bowled off in he 2013/14 Ashes.Swann was a much better bowler than Lyon.
Swann has a better bowling average (by miles in many cases) against SA, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka and NZ.Yes as conclusively proven when they bowled off in he 2013/14 Ashes.
Ahh yes... the one where Swann was injured and retired half way through.Yes as conclusively proven when they bowled off in he 2013/14 Ashes.
Was Swann remotely fit during the 2013/14 Ashes? And that's before you factor the difference between coming on after the top order have been decimated by Johnson & Harris and what Swann was facing.Swann has a better bowling average (by miles in many cases) against SA, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka and NZ.
Lyon wins country to country head to head then Bangladesh + Windies