Yes, but imagine if he had to keep his whole career instead of for a short part of it. Would he look as great of a batsman in those circumstances,do you think Kumar Sangakarra would be a great player in any Test team around the world?
Well see, Sangakarra at the start of his career was a keeper who was just an okay batsman. If it were not for playing International cricket for Sri Lanka, its unlikely he'd have been able to raise his batsmanship up to the level where he became an ATG. If it were not due to SL needing a keeper around the time of his debut, he might have never got his break in the side, and end up leaving cricket to purse a career in Law.Yes, but imagine if he had to keep his whole career instead of for a short part of it. Would he look as great of a batsman in those circumstances,
Traitor !!Big day. C'mon you Deshis.
whats the point of saying that. It applies to every cricketer to have every played, does it not?When have I ever not rated Shakib?
I said only that his all round ability is brought about by a combination of his talents and the needs of Bangladesh. Were he to play for a different nation he'd be used very differently and would have better bowling/batting stats at the expense of the other discipline.
Mark Waugh on the radio yesterday indicated Shaun's brother is still the young allrounder Australia is looking for, and has loads of potential too.I really miss that young Shaun Marsh. So much potential you know
Taijul averages 12 with a solitary fifty in Bangladeshi domestic cricket.
Every run he can score from here on out is a bonus.
i don't know I think it would be pretty funnyYeah but if he hangs around for an hour to make 3 that's pretty pointless
That'd be perfect if Tamim gets going.Yeah but if he hangs around for an hour to make 3 that's pretty pointless
no i like my signature.***** signature bet that Kayes doesn't reach 20