• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Airtel Twenty20 Champions League 2009

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Hmm looking at Holland this tournament, really dont see anything special about him. Maybe T20 is not his best format.
 

laksh_01

State Vice-Captain
Hi, some how am not impressed with the 2009 ACLT20 tournament format. I would have preferred this format for 2009 Tournament or atleast 2010 Tournament:

16 Teams (for Exp):

Deccan Chargers (India 1)
Royal Challengers Bangalore (India 2)
New South Wales Blues (Aus 1)
Victoria Bushrangers (Aus 2)
Cape Cobras (Saf 1)
Diamond Eagles (Saf 2)
Sussex Sharks (Eng 1)
Somerset Sabres (Eng 2)
Trinidad and Tobago (Win 1)
Jamaica (Win 2)
Sialkot Stallions (Pak 1)
Lahore Lions (Pak 2)
Otago Volts (Nzl 1)
Canterbury (Nzl 2)

Wayamba (Srl 1)
??? (Srl 2)


Groups: (Groups to be decided by ICC National T20 ranking)

Group A:
Sialkot Stallions (1)
Sussex Sharks (5)
Jamaica (12)
Victoria Bushrangers (16)

Group B:
Wayamba (2)
Deccan Chargers (6)
Diamond Eagles (11)
Canterbury (15)

Group C:
Cape Cobras (3)
Otago Volts (7)
??? (10)
Royal Challengers Bangalore (14)

Group D:
Trinidad And Tobago (4)

New South Wales Blues (8)
Lahore Lions (9)
Somerset Sabres (13)

Format:
Group Matches
Quarter Finals
Semi Finals
Final
Plate Final.


Pls post ur opinions...
 

brockley

International Captain
Not very running at a loss,mainly because the ipls did not qualify for the finals.
A ipl double final would have been a cash burner.
 

Top