silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Yeah, they were about 50 behind gong into tea with 6 down, so I was assuming 25-30 deficit if they got Pant early.They could have led by more than that tbh but Pant’s knock was wonderful tbf
Yeah, they were about 50 behind gong into tea with 6 down, so I was assuming 25-30 deficit if they got Pant early.They could have led by more than that tbh but Pant’s knock was wonderful tbf
Sure. But the question is would you still have put England as the favorites?tbf Tufnell did say 'might'. And mentally, batting after skittling India for less than 205 would be a very different proposition to facing a 160 run deficit and being smashed by India's lower order for best part of two sessions.
I'm guessing that the contents of said nappy were more attractive than England's latest batting display.How many wickets can England lose in the time it takes to change a nappy? The answer is at least two.
No I wouldn't, but neither did Tufnell in that particular quote.Sure. But the question is would you still have put England as the favorites?
If England had secured a 50 run lead and then cobbled together 200-ish in their second I think they'd be favourites, yeah.Sure. But the question is would you still have put England as the favorites?
Can't blame him for that one. I think we all want this to be over as quickly as possible, and he's probably got better things to do than watch England trying to bat.That was pretty quick from 3rd umpire. Should've checked from another angle if the ball was still in his hand when he dislodged the bails.