Or he scores 60 before lunch and sets up Australia for a huge score...Bringing in an aggressive opener who likely departs early is better for India.
Last edited:
Or he scores 60 before lunch and sets up Australia for a huge score...Bringing in an aggressive opener who likely departs early is better for India.
Not against Bumrah. Good luck. 1 in 4 inns maybe.Or he scores 60 before lunch and sets up Australia for a huge score...
Don't think they really have one. Renshaw I guess?Australia should bring in a decent leftie.
Indian bowling is pretty ordinary against left handers both historically and right now.
Australia's best two batters this series are both lefties. It's no coincidence.
I get the sentiment but if he is actually your best bat outside of this group, then he absolutely deserves to be picked. The selectors have to do what is best for Australian cricket and many folks have learned on the job at the international level.Konstas still shouldn't be anywhere near the team at this point in his career. Throwing him in the deep end (especially with the absolutely absurd degree of media hype around him) would be frankly bordering on negligent at this very early stage. Putting such a vast degree of pressure on someone who has still played so little professional cricket in the grand scheme of things does not sit well with me at all
Yeah I did not have money on him being your new Rob Quiney.That might be the most ****ed selectoral decision I’ve seen from our selectors this side of Phil Hughes. Talk about throwing him under the bus.
Yeah but Khawaja being a leftie hasn't helped him much. And even in his current form, I'd still expect Khawaja to do better than Harris or Renshaw.Australia should bring in a decent leftie.
Indian bowling is pretty ordinary against left handers both historically and right now.
Australia's best two batters this series are both lefties. It's no coincidence.
the names even rhyme sort ofYeah I did not have money on him being your new Rob Quiney.
The problem is that there's no real evidence he actually is. He's made two First Class hundreds and they were both in the same match. Moreover it was a drawn match on a road where McSweeney made an unbeaten hundred and a half century, and Carey made over 200 runs as well. Technical flaws have already been noticed as well.I get the sentiment but if he is actually your best bat outside of this group, then he absolutely deserves to be picked.
Because he is horribly out of form/finished/too old.Yeah but Khawaja being a leftie hasn't helped him much. And even in his current form, I'd still expect Khawaja to do better than Harris or Renshaw.
Thats the main issue.Don't think they really have one. Renshaw I guess?
Renshaw's form has looked worse than Khawaja's outside of maybe one match.Because he is horribly out of form/finished/too old.
Don't agree. There's plenty of other examples outside Ponting that negates your point. The situation doesn't demand it but it is an option. That said I see there's talk of him replacing McSweeney. That is the worst outcome of the lot despite getting Konstas in the side. Perhaps Boof has a point about Bailey being too chummy with the established players after all. Terrible decision to cut N Mc.It isn't even a remotely comparable situation to someone like Ponting, who while quite young had already had been playing Shield cricket for 2-3 seasons and had been absolutely gunning it. Konstas has played all of 9 Shield games. Absolute apples and oranges
As for Pucovski, he really shouldn't have been picked for the Test he played anyway imo with all his issues, but that's a topic for another day
Tim Ward ffsDon't think they really have one. Renshaw I guess?
I am not outright against young guys getting at Test chance... if they have a decent body of work (more than just one good year preferably) behind them in FC cricket, something which Konstas simply doesn't have. Pretty much everyone I have seen named, even if not that much older than he is now, had at least been around domestically for longer than thisDon't agree. There's plenty of other examples outside Ponting that negates your point. The situation doesn't demand it but it is an option. That said I see there's talk of him replacing McSweeney. That is the worst outcome of the lot despite getting Konstas in the side. Perhaps Boof has a point about Bailey being too chummy with the established players after all. Terrible decision to cut N Mc.