FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Mahmood is a handy batsman IMO. I don't see any reason he couldn't bat at 8. Has a FC average in the mid teens, and a couple of 50s.
So why not pack up and all head home then right now?marc71178 said:It's realism, not pessimism.
If we can lose from the position we were in in the Second Test, then I don't see how we can avoid defeat in any of the remaining games.
Hence the favourite series score is now 5-0.
Can only get 7-4 on that as well![]()
He's the only other option we have - which is why I initially said that this wasn't a case of Giles vs Panesar, but was Giles and Anderson vs Panesar and Mahmood.FaaipDeOiad said:Mahmood is a handy batsman IMO. I don't see any reason he couldn't bat at 8. Has a FC average in the mid teens, and a couple of 50s.
Yeah, but IIRC Brett Lee had a rubbish FC average when he started his career too. I think Mahmood could turn out to be a pretty decent batsman, though he could also go the way of Harmison.marc71178 said:He's the only other option we have - which is why I initially said that this wasn't a case of Giles vs Panesar, but was Giles and Anderson vs Panesar and Mahmood.
That said, his record in FC isn't that great though (average for Lancashire ov just over half Giles' for Warwickshire)
If I had seen it I would have read it.marc71178 said:Well maybe you'd not have made that comment if you had bothered to read what I've said.
All along I've defended Giles because there was simply nobody around who could do the job he did any better.
There still isn't anyone who can do the number 8 and spin option.
There is however someone who could play as a more attacking spinner (and as either one of a 4 man attack or as the lone spinner in a 5 man attack provided another number 8 comes along)
So did the likes of Darren Gough.FaaipDeOiad said:Mahmood is a handy batsman IMO. I don't see any reason he couldn't bat at 8. Has a FC average in the mid teens, and a couple of 50s.
Don't get the point of this post. Gough was a pretty good batsman, made some big scores against Australia in test cricket.Craig said:So did the likes of Darren Gough.
IIRC before the 3rd Test in 2001 in a county game Gough scored 96 for Yorkshire![]()
For about a year...PhoenixFire said:Yeah, Goughy was actually a half decent batsman, that could bat and do well at No.8 in tests.
Don't think he'd make all that much difference to be honest, swing bowlers really only seem to work under English conditions with the duke ball.Matt79 said:Wonder what England would give for a fully-fit Simon Jones right now...
I think Pietersen scored 467 last series... ???PhoenixFire said:If I'm not mistaken, then Ponting has already scored more runs in 2 tests, than anyone did in the entire 05 series.
spindizzy said:Don't think he'd make all that much difference to be honest, swing bowlers really only seem to work under English conditions with the duke ball.
The thing that keeps amusing me is the continual calls for Jaques inclusion in the Australian side. He's currently about 30th on batting averages with an average in the low 30s, hardly a huge cry for inclusion. The scores against a warm-up, understrength England count for naught. Rogers would seem a much better replacement as an opener with already a 279 with an average of 91 to his name this season or Ronchi if you want a swap for Martyn. The talk about Jaques seems to be because he's from NSW and that's where the press are centred.
Easy to tell where you're fromClapo said:
Haha, Queensland (1 to mespindizzy said:Easy to tell where you're from![]()