• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** 3rd Test at the WACA

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Mahmood is a handy batsman IMO. I don't see any reason he couldn't bat at 8. Has a FC average in the mid teens, and a couple of 50s.
 

Craig

World Traveller
marc71178 said:
It's realism, not pessimism.

If we can lose from the position we were in in the Second Test, then I don't see how we can avoid defeat in any of the remaining games.

Hence the favourite series score is now 5-0.

Can only get 7-4 on that as well :(
So why not pack up and all head home then right now?
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
FaaipDeOiad said:
Mahmood is a handy batsman IMO. I don't see any reason he couldn't bat at 8. Has a FC average in the mid teens, and a couple of 50s.
He's the only other option we have - which is why I initially said that this wasn't a case of Giles vs Panesar, but was Giles and Anderson vs Panesar and Mahmood.

That said, his record in FC isn't that great though (average for Lancashire of just over half Giles' for Warwickshire)

Also Giles has 3 tons and 17 half centuries in his time (actually gets to 50 once every 7 knocks for Warwickshire.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
marc71178 said:
He's the only other option we have - which is why I initially said that this wasn't a case of Giles vs Panesar, but was Giles and Anderson vs Panesar and Mahmood.

That said, his record in FC isn't that great though (average for Lancashire ov just over half Giles' for Warwickshire)
Yeah, but IIRC Brett Lee had a rubbish FC average when he started his career too. I think Mahmood could turn out to be a pretty decent batsman, though he could also go the way of Harmison.
 

Craig

World Traveller
marc71178 said:
Well maybe you'd not have made that comment if you had bothered to read what I've said.

All along I've defended Giles because there was simply nobody around who could do the job he did any better.

There still isn't anyone who can do the number 8 and spin option.

There is however someone who could play as a more attacking spinner (and as either one of a 4 man attack or as the lone spinner in a 5 man attack provided another number 8 comes along)
If I had seen it I would have read it.
 

Craig

World Traveller
FaaipDeOiad said:
Mahmood is a handy batsman IMO. I don't see any reason he couldn't bat at 8. Has a FC average in the mid teens, and a couple of 50s.
So did the likes of Darren Gough.

IIRC before the 3rd Test in 2001 in a county game Gough scored 96 for Yorkshire :mellow:
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Craig said:
So did the likes of Darren Gough.

IIRC before the 3rd Test in 2001 in a county game Gough scored 96 for Yorkshire :mellow:
Don't get the point of this post. Gough was a pretty good batsman, made some big scores against Australia in test cricket.
 

greg

International Debutant
PhoenixFire said:
Yeah, Goughy was actually a half decent batsman, that could bat and do well at No.8 in tests.
For about a year...

After his injury in Australia and he was caught hooking first ball in his first innings the following summer against Windies, he became a genuine no10/11.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
If I'm not mistaken, then Ponting has already scored more runs in 2 tests, than anyone did in the entire 05 series.
 

Tomm NCCC

International 12th Man
Ive been on Saj's back for a bit, and he has gone for a fair few, but then again, harmison and anderson have pretty much hit rock bottom. He swings the ball, and someone said on the forum that he can produce the ball which will get any batsman out. We havent got anything to lsoe (Well, the ashes) might aswell have a bash.
 

spindizzy

Cricket Spectator
Matt79 said:
Wonder what England would give for a fully-fit Simon Jones right now...
Don't think he'd make all that much difference to be honest, swing bowlers really only seem to work under English conditions with the duke ball.

The thing that keeps amusing me is the continual calls for Jaques inclusion in the Australian side. He's currently about 30th on batting averages with an average in the low 30s, hardly a huge cry for inclusion. The scores against a warm-up, understrength England count for naught. Rogers would seem a much better replacement as an opener with already a 279 with an average of 91 to his name this season or Ronchi if you want a swap for Martyn. The talk about Jaques seems to be because he's from NSW and that's where the press are centred.
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
PhoenixFire said:
If I'm not mistaken, then Ponting has already scored more runs in 2 tests, than anyone did in the entire 05 series.
I think Pietersen scored 467 last series... ??? :unsure:
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
spindizzy said:
Don't think he'd make all that much difference to be honest, swing bowlers really only seem to work under English conditions with the duke ball.

The thing that keeps amusing me is the continual calls for Jaques inclusion in the Australian side. He's currently about 30th on batting averages with an average in the low 30s, hardly a huge cry for inclusion. The scores against a warm-up, understrength England count for naught. Rogers would seem a much better replacement as an opener with already a 279 with an average of 91 to his name this season or Ronchi if you want a swap for Martyn. The talk about Jaques seems to be because he's from NSW and that's where the press are centred.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

8-)
 

spindizzy

Cricket Spectator
Alright, more realistically Voges. Or Cosgrove if you want to blood a youngster with a lot of potential. But Jaques? After a decent season last year (top 20 averages), no really big scores in Pura Cup, what is the thinking behind including him? Not seeing any stand-out performances, just solidish. Cosgrove makes a far better case for inclusion.
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
spindizzy said:
Easy to tell where you're from 8-)
Haha, Queensland (1 to me:cool: )

Ronchi for Martyn?? You gotta be kidding me, thats like saying we should swap Beau Casson for Shane Warne 8-)

As for the Rogers/Jaques argument.... Rogers is a good FC player, who's been made look great thanks to the road at the WACA for the past few seasons. Jaques on the other hand has crunched all comers on a vast variety of wickets.

Need i remind you of a Double Century & Century in the same FC match against India A earlier in the year. Add to that quite a few centuries in county cricket, 2 centuries against England in successive matches and i think it's fair to say that he's got it all over Rogers.
 

Top