RossTaylorsBox
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Daily pants update - soiled
You say it happens to everyone but I don't recall any other instance of a third umpire giving a decision without first looking at what he was asked to make a decision about. Are there any other examples in however many years it is since the system was brought in ?Anil's a great umpire. Just having a bad day. Happens to everyone.
bucknor would have given it out and refused a review if rahane opted for oneAgree, I mean its ok if he did not check it at first but when players specifically told him that is what they want checked, he should have. I assume there may have been miscommunication and one of the field umpires perhaps was not as good with his English as he could have been, coz the alternative does sound shockingly incompetent at best and blatantly biased at worst.
Once again, Pant has been reckless. He could just have easily been dismissed in single figures. Problem is, if Pant scores runs tomorrow then he'll be backed unconditionally for 5 years. God knows hes been backed long enough.
Any bets on him dropping 10+ catches? Though I'm Indian, it was a pleasure to Foakes keep. I hope Pant drops a few tomorrow, we're winning this game anyway. His poor keeping has to be shown up. I'd go for Saha or even Kl Rahul over him, if we want batting, as KL is easily a better Test batsman
Pant is about as undroppable as you can get at this point.Once again, Pant has been reckless. He could just have easily been dismissed in single figures. Problem is, if Pant scores runs tomorrow then he'll be backed unconditionally for 5 years. God knows hes been backed long enough.
Any bets on him dropping 10+ catches? Though I'm Indian, it was a pleasure to Foakes keep. I hope Pant drops a few tomorrow, we're winning this game anyway. His poor keeping has to be shown up. I'd go for Saha or even Kl Rahul over him, if we want batting, as KL is easily a better Test batsman
Hardly. It would be ludicrous to call Pant a specialist batsman. As it is, he is just about survinving as a shoddy wicketkeeper batsman because he has license to hit. And hitting is all he can do, that too against spinners - I've never seen him hit pace bowling.Pant is about as undroppable as you can get at this point.
I agree about his keeping but there’s a bigger likelihood that they’d play both Saha and Pant than drop Pant and play Saha.
Not ludicrous considering the weight of runs compared to others like Shaw, Agarwal, Vihari.Hardly. It would be ludicrous to call Pant a specialist batsman. As it is, he is just about survinving as a shoddy wicketkeeper batsman because he has license to hit. And hitting is all he can do, that too against spinners - I've never seen him hit pace bowling.
Shaw is rubbish but Agarwal and Vihari are much more experienced than Pant. They grinded it in Ranji for a long time, they should be given preference over Pant.Not ludicrous considering the weight of runs compared to others like Shaw, Agarwal, Vihari.
You can say whatever you want. He will not and cannot be dropped after his recent performances with the bat. That's just a fact of life in Indian cricket. So arguing it is pointless even if you disagree with it.Hardly. It would be ludicrous to call Pant a specialist batsman. As it is, he is just about survinving as a shoddy wicketkeeper batsman because he has license to hit. And hitting is all he can do, that too against spinners - I've never seen him hit pace bowling.
Not really Bollywood actress level famous. A page 3 socialite though.Is Sharma's wife/girlfriend famous ? The cameras were on her more than the cricket.
Maybe he has cut it down as his back might flare up the more he bowls.Haha
I know I bleat on about it, but feel Root could definitely back himself to bowl a few more overs. He's genuinely quite a decent part-timer imo, and could take a few in these conditions