RossTaylorsBox
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
5 heads in a row is statistically impossible.
Dropped.Panauti
a
n
a
u
t
i
Your face is statistically impossible.5 heads in a row is statistically impossible.
You do mean tossing salad in the kitchen right?He obviously doesn't get enough practice tossing at home. Sack Anushka.
Please don't invite me to your dinner party.You do mean tossing salad in the kitchen right?
Okay lets go with that.You do mean tossing salad in the kitchen right?
Special dressing just for youPlease don't invite me to your dinner party.
Spot on! Don't need Sundar at home where we can play a frontline spinner who can pick wickets. Sure he can be a better option in overseas conditions when we don't have Ash and need a spinner to support the pacers and bat a bit.Agarwal
Gill
Pujara
Kohli
Rahane
Pant
Ashwin
Axar/Chahar
Kuldeep
Ishant
Bumrah
India must win the next match so have to play 5 proper bowlers. Sundar is a batting all-rounder so I wouldn't pick him.
Don't share your faith in our batting especially with the non-performing number 5. Hoped we wouldn't need Sundar at home too, but I think we're stuck (?) with him for now.Spot on! Don't need Sundar at home where we can play a frontline spinner who can pick wickets. Sure he can be a better option in overseas conditions when we don't have Ash and need a spinner to support the pacers and bat a bit.
I agree but I think that side I posted gives us the best chance of winning. Also, if Axar is fit I think Sundar goes out anyways, as that was the original side they had planned for Chennai. I wont mind seeing Chahar or Kuldeep play tbh.I don't think Ashwin batting above eight is really viable anymore. He hasn't made a half century for 25 Tests, and he averages 18 in that period. He has looked slightly better in the last couple of Tests but he's a far cry from really being an option at #7 IMO.
Sundar needs to come in with a better bowling plan - not sure how much blame to attribute to himself, Kohli and Ravi respectively, but the fields set when he was bowling in the first innings were awful - but he does need to retain his spot for sure IMO.
Kuldeep or possibly Siraj in for Nadeem depending on the conditions.
I could just as easily say something equally as vapid like "the first four bowlers have to take responsibility for the wicket taking, not the fifth bowler", but I won't, because these context-free junk cricket philosophy posts are the worst thing about online cricket discussion. You don't win tight cricket series by ignoring the margins because "it's not their responsibility".The top 6 have to take responsibility for the run scoring not your no.7 and 8.
India doesn't have a proper 2nd spinner, so they will play two -probably Axar and Kuldeep and hope at least one of them turns up.I could just as easily say something equally as vapid like "the first four bowlers have to take responsibility for the wicket taking, not the fifth bowler", but I won't, because these context-free junk cricket philosophy posts are the worst thing about online cricket discussion. You don't win tight cricket series by ignoring the margins because "it's not their responsibility".
Incidentally, "must win game = m00000re bowlers" is right up there is this regard too. If you lose by 20 runs on fifth morning and your fifth bowler has taken 2/150 and bagged a pair at #10, cliches won't help you.
I don't think Ashwin batting above eight is really viable anymore. He hasn't made a half century for 25 Tests, and he averages 18 in that period. He has looked slightly better in the last couple of Tests but he's a far cry from really being an option at #7 IMO.
Sundar needs to come in with a better bowling plan - not sure how much blame to attribute to himself, Kohli and Ravi respectively, but the fields set when he was bowling in the first innings were awful - but he does need to retain his spot for sure IMO.
Kuldeep or possibly Siraj in for Nadeem depending on the conditions.