• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** 2nd Test at Adelaide

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I mean under the old rules you could probably say it wasn't worth it live but yeah that should've been referred.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That difficulty the English batsmen are having getting forward against our faster bowlers certainly isn't helping them.

The umpiring has been verging on poor here.
 

Cow

Banned
Yeah... new rules.. that's really dumb not to review. Hazlewood needs to tell Smith to 'get f'ed' in that situation and take control.
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I rally wish the Aussies would get things right side up... it is runs/wickets not wickets/runs....
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I rally wish the Aussies would get things right side up... it is runs/wickets not wickets/runs....
Once you start putting the FoW and the bowling figures that way round we'll say it's the right way. Putting the smaller number first simply makes more sense.



England really need to work the singles this innings. This is fine from Stoneman but more nudging would also be good.
 

mintykip

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Right, if England don't come out and at least try and make a bit of a statement or whatever cricket cliche you want to use, then send them all home. Out of nothing we have a sniff, a tiny one but still a sniff, no body now wants to see a clueless 180 all out.
 

Top